vaccinated individuals infected with delta may be able to transmit the virus as easily as those who are unvaccinated. vaccinated people infected with delta have measurable viral loads similar to those who are unvaccinated and infected with the variant. this afternoon, president biden took a much more aggressive stance in facing the escalating covid virus and resistance to vaccines. this is an american tragedy. people will die who don t have to die. if you re out there, unvaccinated, you don t have to die. the administration is now confronted with the reality that its work to stop the spread of covid could potentially face a major setback. today the president acknowledged that threat and took the first step toward imposing tough new regulations that will affect millions. it s time to impose requirements on key groups. every federal government employee will be asked to attest to their vaccination status. anyone who does not attest or is not vaccinated will be required to
body worn throughout the d.o.i. in response d.o.i. issued a new draft about body worn camera policy. the leadership council for human rights and dozens of other organizations came together in 2015 to release basic civil rights principles for body worn camera usage. though turned those principles into eight criteria for which to evaluate body camera policies. we measured interior s policy against the leadership criteria. interior s draft interim policy only fully met one of eight criteria. that s an 88% failure rate. 88%. the deficiencies are significant. the policy isn t publicly available. it doesn t limit biometric technologies like facial recognition. it doesn t prevent the officer from seeing footage before writing a report about an incident. in fact, on many of the important questions like those the interior policy says that bureau should decide. that creates an inconsistent set of basic civil protections that will change depending on which bureau s law enforcement offic
body worn throughout the d.o.i. in response d.o.i. issued a new draft about body worn camera policy. the leadership council for human rights and dozens of other organizations came together in 2015 to release basic civil rights principles for body worn camera usage. though turned those principles into eight criteria for which to evaluate body camera policies. we measured interior s policy against the leadership criteria. interior s draft interim policy only fully met one of eight criteria. that s an 88% failure rate. 88%. the deficiencies are significant. the policy isn t publicly available. it doesn t limit biometric technologies like facial recognition. it doesn t prevent the officer from seeing footage before writing a report about an incident. in fact, on many of the important questions like those the interior policy says that bureau should decide. that creates an inconsistent set of basic civil protections that will change depending on which bureau s law enforcement offic
officers to wear body cameras and you have dashboard cameras in marked vehicles. due to technical issues, the beginning of this hearing could not be shown. ked vehicles. due to technical issues the beginning of this hearing could not be in a response, a draft was issued on the policy. the leadership for civil and human rights and other new draft about body worn camera policy. the leadership council for human rights and dozens of other organizations came together in 2015 to release basic civil rights principles for body worn camera usage. though turned those principles into eight criteria for which to evaluate body camera policies. we measured interior s policy against the leadership criteria. interior s draft interim policy only fully met one of eight criteria. that s an 88% failure rate. 88%. the deficiencies are significant. the policy isn t publicly available. it doesn t limit biometric technologies like facial recognition. it doesn t prevent the officer from seeing footag
meeting in june, and this subpoena essentially prompted this meeting where we know that the trump lawyers gave a little tour to some of the prosecutors and investigators doing this investigation, showed them where these documents were being held, and at the end of that meeting they left with classified documents, documents that were national security information. that s the reason why that meeting occurred. what it tells us is that these conversations, these discussions that were on going between trump lawyers and the justice department turned contentious much earlier, much, much earlier than the search that occurred on monday. we re also learning that part of all of this involves a witness, at least one witness. do we know, was that witness saying there s still documents you missed on june 8th? this witness told them there were definitely documents being held at mar-a-lago that the fbi needed to get, obviously wanted to get. this was information that included classified