unlike chauvin, simpson became a spectacle. big on personalities but little in common with how trials are conducted all across the country every day. back then, the judge lance ito and the lawyers became as much the focus as the underlying facts. johnny crock ran and others compromised the simpson dream team. we even met our first kardashian. a lawyer and friend of o.j. the shoes and isotoner gloves and who can forget furman, lang? marcia clark got a new hair style, it was big news! the empitome of simpson, the house get kcado. while covering the case and writing letters from los angeles for his vanity fair column. and then when each trial day ended, many of us tuned into larry king live for the recap. he always had the central players as guests. but as for the administration of justice? it was a fiasco. in the end, o.j. walked even though we all knew he did it! and cameras were often blamed as the culprit. i never bought into that. the cameras weren t to blame. and the pro
i understand the court s personal feelings about it, but i do believe we want to clear. i don t believe we can give them and let them do it in private. so we have our laptop ready to go, so if they give us any numbers they want to see, we should be able to pull them up. your honor, i agree with the first part of that. i don t know what exhibits the jurors wish to see. we, the defense, has a real problem with them seeing the drone footage. what has come out, we have a motion pending before the court from this trial based upon disclosure of evidence, and if they want to see that, that is just tainting this jury more. i asked the court to consider the drone footage was turned over by an anonymous person who we supposedly now know who it is, mr. beeman. on the first friday of the jury we were provided a copy of that from mr. krause that was neither in the length or definition of clarity that the state had. we did not get the full download that they received until saturday or
let s bring in barbara mcquade along with greg bluestein, msnbc political contributor for the atlanta journal-constitution. and author of flood, how georgia turned purple and broke the monopoly on republican power. greg, if you will, start us off. i mentioned the former president will be showing up. the arraignment will still go forward. what can we expect? in georgia defendants have the right to waive their arraignments. it s no surprise that at least a dozen of the co-defendants have already done so. that means they re gonna be bypassing with a packed courtroom, tv cameras rolling, they re bypassing logistics. it s not a huge surprise. what happens now as it ramps up the next phase of litigation. which is already underway. there s defendants who are trying to speed up trial, others that are trying to slow the trial down. there are these five that are trying to remove the case to the federal court. what we know now is that donald trump and his litigation strategy revolve
tonight. good evening, rich. good evening, bret. the rest of the republican field is trying to overtake the former president who has remained atop the polls, even as he keeps getting indicted. this latest is trump s fourth indictment. and this time is a photo to go with it. what they are doing is election interference. there it is, the first mugshot of an american president. former president trump is using it as another fundraising opportunity selling never surrender merchandise on his campaign website. including a $34 cotton t-shirt featuring the photo of him surrendering to authorities in georgia. he is definitely politically motivated. it s corrupt. trump s fourth indictment looms over the republican nomination race, one he currently leads. i don t know that anyone in america should look at that and feel good about it. we shouldn t assume that he is going to be convicted. and the second thing is we shouldn t assume that he is going to be the nominee. rest of
is there any possibility the president would end up pardoning his son? no. jesse: fuming at the judge for daring to question the original plea deal. attacking her for being appointed by drug but even comparing the judge to lance ito, remember the guy from the o.j. simpson murder trial? the facts swirling around hunter are pretty damning so the liberal media s working overtime to cover for the first son. there weaponizing joe biden s son against him. only going to add more fuel to the political fire republicans are stoking on capitol hill as they move forward with the potential impeachment charge. that is the goal of what they want to do, buddy of joe biden in the minds of voters ahead of the reelection. they are going to try to indict a father for loving his son, who has been addicted to drugs and/or alcohol, and without evidence of the father doing anything other than loving that son. jesse: get a load of this. as republicans mull impeaching joe biden, adam s