Condemnation. Of the Brazilian Military dictatorship they were gold in any brazilian. No its true that in just about every society the critics are maligned. Or mistreated different ways depending on the nature of the society like them so it unions a world imprisoned. In the us dependency like el salvador at the same time this counterfeit as it other brains blown out by a us run state terrorist worse. Than others is it just condemned their villa from the zone in the United States or one of the terms of abuse is anti american the couple of others like you know more because theres an array of terms of abuse. Of in the United States in a very high degree of freedom and so if youre vilified. Commas or who cares to go on to your work anyway at least concepts only arise in a culture where if you criticize state power and when i state i mean. Were generally not just government but state corporate our if you criticize concentrated power youre against us youre against the be all its quite straig
By more than. 60 , its kind of strange, i wanted to see their result, thats why we think its better to give the military exactly those who are on the front, those who fight, those who risk their lives every day, the main intelligence, the military, those conscripts who were refused help, thats why we think that it is necessary to remove those 200 million from bebu and transfer to other articles, specifically for the military, thank you, please, 892, frieze. Thank you, mr. Chairman, yes, we are returning to bebu, yes, why is it necessary, and why does European Solidarity demand that 200 million be withdrawn from the ineffective bebu. Because we believe that it is more important to direct this money to the national guard, dpsu, pension provision, social protection, for education, for scholarships, because it turns out that the amendments we made, which are 50 million for the national guard, are not there, 24 million are not for the state Security Service, 4 million are not for pensions a
Evolve my leadership style to ensure our success with meeting the mission, the needs of the workforce and the community. Once again, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. I would be very happy to answer any questions the committee may have at this time. Thank you very much, chief. I appreciate that. I think ill just start off about the unattended firearms which was probably, if anything, one of the bigger concerns, since ive been here on the hill. You were just outlining what you would normally do in a case like that. I think you said five days suspension. Something like that. Im sure that depends on the personnel record of that particular individual, if there had been incidents in the past or not, et cetera. But its also my understanding that some of these incidents happened with members of the force that were on sort of special detail with leadership. And is there any do you give that consideration . Or what do you do in a case like that . Yes, maam. First of all,
Weir and mr. Bruder. I realize not every jurisdiction has mandatory recording of interrogations and how would you compare body cameras to other types of interrogations . What are some of the issues that you dont have with the interrogations that you have with the body cameras . Thank you, senator, for the question. As you know, there are other recording devices that are more widespread right now such as dashboard cameras used by Law Enforcement in stops. Those have been proven to be very effective Law Enforcement tools for many of the reasons that you articulated. Oftentimes it shows the officer acting in absolute conformity with the best practices that you would expect from police and Sheriffs Officers and state troopers. It is also great evidence of what actually happens on scene. Its also a good training thing, actually, i think for officers and theyre able to watch each other and see whats good and whats bad and make sure its really it is a very good way i think for people to learn
The unions you know i had theupthe union for my sworn patrol officers and below sergeant, and they were actually my best ally in dealing with issues with benefits and salaries. Thats something you can really, really encourage. So, with that i yield back. Thank you gentleman. This is helpful and hopeful to have a followup meeting soon for the other issues to discuss confidentially in a less public setting because of security reasons. I would like to, at that time, to discuss with the chief efforts to security outside the capital, the district offices, how we use security to sort through the incoming. If you get, you know a thousand emails a day, thats a way to mind that, of using technology to sort through whats likely to be a problem, what is not, and i dont know if thats done at this point, but thats something i want to explore further. With that ill yield back. I thank the gentle lady and the committee members. Pardon me . Second that . Very good. I think all the committee members, o