Association For Democratics Reforms vs Union Of India on 15 February, 2024 indiankanoon.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from indiankanoon.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The two prerequisites for any financial Bill to become a money Bill are that first, it must only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and not the Rajya Sabha. Secondly, these Bills can only be introduced on the President’s recommendation.
The Supreme Court decides to examine whether the use of personal information such as call records data or hotels bills can be seized on court orders and be used in cases of alleged adultery in matrimonial relationships.
Most NGOs don’t have SBI account
Updated:
Updated:
From April 1, a Delhi account is a mandatory provision to receive foreign funds
Share Article
From April 1, a Delhi account is a mandatory provision to receive foreign funds
An Assam-based NGO has also moved the Gauhati High Court against another amended provision of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) that makes Aadhaar mandatory for opening and operating the account in Delhi.
The Gauhati High Court on May 5 sent a notice to the SBI asking it to explain why Aadhaar was necessary to open a bank account, when in 2018, the Supreme Court in the
January 21, 2021
The Supreme Court has dismissed petitions seeking review of the 2018 judgment that upheld the certification of the Aadhaar Act as a money bill, and its subsequent passage in Parliament in that form. The majority judgment said there was “no case of review” and threw out the seven review petitions. The order was passed by a five-judge bench headed by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar.
Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, who gave the only dissenting opinion in the 2018 Puttaswamy judgment, also dissented to the Supreme Court dismissing the review petitions. Drawing out a map of how another bench of the Supreme Court later called out the failings of the Puttaswamy judgment around money bills, Justice Chandrachud said that “it is a constitutional error to hold at this stage that no ground exists to review the judgment”.