might embolden others to think, you know, no accountability. i got away with it. i ll wait for a trial, but i can do something in the meanwhile? so that s a great question, and that s the very issue. you need a system that s designed to make a system that s fair, that s just, that does not disproportionately impact people and leave them in jail, mostly people of color who cannot afford to make bail. you don t want to have knee jerk reactions by saying, hey, wait a second, in this instance that we re looking at there on video, he should be in jail. there should have been bail. therefore, let s reform the system again. i think you need some measure of judicial discretion. you need judges to evaluate and not the legislature just to make cookie cutter. you know, i know, that every case has its own nuanced facts, its own issues, and judges have to make determinations predicated on those facts to make good decisions. otherwise to your point, it emboldens other people. you re not going to s
about this. what is being contemplated is there is a lot of rise in politically motivated violence inactivity. you ve got a disagreement, you ve got the insurrection, you ve got the attempt to assassinate the supreme court justice. you ve got the attacks on a michigan governor. are you concerned that when you see things like this and see the idea of him being released, it might embolden others to think, you know, no accountability. i got away with it. i ll wait for a trial, but i can do something in the meanwhile? so that s a great question, and that s the very issue. you need a system that s designed to make a system that s fair, that s just, that does not disproportionately impact people and leave them in jail, mostly people of color who cannot afford to make bail. you don t want to have knee jerk reactions by saying, hey, wait a second, in this instance that we re looking at there on video, he should be in jail. there should have been bail. therefore, let s reform the system again