imagine there s an attack and the president of the united states, the only person that you can t taunt with the phrase you and what army, stands by and does nothing or stands by and stands back. i mean, all the way back, back at the white house in the dining room for more than three hours watching it all unfold on tv. no calls to the military that he commands in chief, crickets. you d probably tell me it s impossible. it would never happen. you d probably say, look, if that were a show i d stop watching. they d jump the shark. only it did happen in reality , and we heard how the president ignored desperate pleas from his own aides, his allies inside and outside of the government, even his own family. don t forget the fake electors plot in trying to weaponize the doj all in some attempt to hang onto power. but imagine just because the attackers were americans, well, that didn t change the duty of the president. it didn t change the duty of the officers to protect congress and
about this. what is being contemplated is there is a lot of rise in politically motivated violence inactivity. you ve got a disagreement, you ve got the insurrection, you ve got the attempt to assassinate the supreme court justice. you ve got the attacks on a michigan governor. are you concerned that when you see things like this and see the idea of him being released, it might embolden others to think, you know, no accountability. i got away with it. i ll wait for a trial, but i can do something in the meanwhile? so that s a great question, and that s the very issue. you need a system that s designed to make a system that s fair, that s just, that does not disproportionately impact people and leave them in jail, mostly people of color who cannot afford to make bail. you don t want to have knee jerk reactions by saying, hey, wait a second, in this instance that we re looking at there on video, he should be in jail. there should have been bail. therefore, let s reform the system again