Histories. Place children, families and seniors directly in the path of a large Homeless Population is dangerous and responsible and wrong. This is not about placing Navigation Centres where homeless are because the add mittanchomeless. If the ports goal is to reduce homelessness on port property, the proposed Navigation Centre will do the exact opposite. Navigation centres should be located in areas where they will not pose a threat to safety and families. No one will consider locating a centre in the middle of seacliff or pacific heights. Why blaz place this in the middf our thriving community. The city is imposing this on the port, businesses and friends, families, joggers, cyclists, sports fans, mayor typ maritimd everyone else. This is merely a prop box but a propup for four years. The city should look into permanent Navigation Solutions and investments. Tomorrotom portland, please. This centre will be a magnet for homeless and there are risks to the Public Safety and i should not
If the ports goal is to reduce homelessness on port property, the proposed Navigation Centre will do the exact opposite. Navigation centres should be located in areas where they will not pose a threat to safety and families. No one will consider locating a centre in the middle of seacliff or pacific heights. Why blaz place this in the middf our thriving community. The city is imposing this on the port, businesses and friends, families, joggers, cyclists, sports fans, mayor typ maritimd everyone else. This is merely a prop box but a propup for four years. The city should look into permanent Navigation Solutions and investments. Tomorrotom portland, please. This centre will be a magnet for homeless and there are risks to the Public Safety and i should not have to walk out my door and fear for my personal safety on a daily basis. This is not what our residential nakeneighborhood wants or needs. Its time the city started caring more about residents and pay the tax and stop forcing this. Na
Homelessness on port property, the proposed Navigation Centre will do the exact opposite. Navigation centres should be located in areas where they will not pose a threat to safety and families. No one will consider locating a centre in the middle of seacliff or pacific heights. Why blaz place this in the middf our thriving community. The city is imposing this on the port, businesses and friends, families, joggers, cyclists, sports fans, mayor typ maritimd everyone else. This is merely a prop box but a propup for four years. The city should look into permanent Navigation Solutions and investments. Tomorrotom portland, please. This centre will be a magnet for homeless and there are risks to the Public Safety and i should not have to walk out my door and fear for my personal safety on a daily basis. This is not what our residential nakeneighborhood wants or needs. Its time the city started caring more about residents and pay the tax and stop forcing this. Nancy floyd and wallace lee. My n
Fundamentally decent person. [shouting] anyone who knows you knows that to be true. [shouting] mr. Chairman, i dont know that the committee should have to put up with this type of insulins thats going on in this room today. [shouting] and, frankly, these people are so out off line t they shouldnt even be allowed in the ring. Judge kavanaugh, im proud of you. I know how good you are. I know you deserve this position. Im proud of the president for nominating you and, frankly, i wish you the best because were going to confirmsi you. Out of courtesy to Ranking Member feinstein, she wants to introduce people were in the audience, and so she can take what time t she wants right now. Thank you. I will be very fast. Id like to recognize marc morial, the president of the National Urban league. Melanie campbell, the president and ceo of the National Coalition on black civic participation. Reverend al t sharpton, the president of National Action network. Vanita gupta, Leadership Conference of civ
Consequence judge kavanaughs made a significant contribution to our nations jurisprudence. And hes won from both sides of the political spectrum. The committee has received letters from former clerks, former colleagues, former students and former classmates all attesting to judge kavanaughs sterling character and qualifications. Some of whom were democrats. Imminent members of the Supreme Court, bar and legal academia have all written in strong support of judge kavanaughs nomination. The authors of these letters emphasize that they have different political views and that they do not agree on every subject. But to a person, they speak of judge kavanaughs integrity and judgment and they enthusiastically endorse his nomination. I would like to highlight one letter, in particular, from 18 of judge kavanaughs former women law clerks. Thats all of his former women clerks, all of them, who are not precluded by their current or pending employment from signing the letter. They write that, quote