Karen Popp News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Karen popp. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Karen Popp Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Their health care needs. All right. Im happy to end on that note with apologies to the panel because i had not vetted that question before hand. You did that remarkably well. Join me in thanking ian, justin and jody. ; fort knox was chosen because it was the most impenetrable. There had been lots of gold already transferred there. So the secretary of the treasury gives permission to use a portion of the depository. Tonight, the decision to move americas most important Historical Documents to fort knox on december 26, 1941. First, he has to make the decision, what documents would be there. So he makes this decision very methodically on what is going to go to fort knox. These are considered the most valuable documents in the country. And the magna carta is the document that he has been asked to preserve for the britt for the brits. Tonight on q a. Next, a look at trying to. Top her option we open our phone lines and take a loo ....
Their health care needs. All right. Im happy to end on that note with apologies to the panel because i had not vetted that question before hand. You did that remarkably well. Join me in thanking ian, justin and jody. ; fort knox was chosen because it was the most impenetrable. There had been lots of gold already transferred there. So the secretary of the treasury gives permission to use a portion of the depository. Tonight, the decision to move americas most important Historical Documents to fort knox on december 26, 1941. First, he has to make the decision, what documents would be there. So he makes this decision very methodically on what is going to go to fort knox. These are considered the most valuable documents in the country. And the magna carta is the document that he has been asked to preserve for the britt for the brits. Tonight on q a. Next, a look at trying to. Top her option we open our phone lines and take a loo ....
Their health care needs. All right. Im happy to end on that note with apologies to the panel because i had not vetted that question before hand. You did that remarkably well. Join me in thanking ian, justin and jody. ; fort knox was chosen because it was the most impenetrable. There had been lots of gold already transferred there. So the secretary of the treasury gives permission to use a portion of the depository. Tonight, the decision to move americas most important Historical Documents to fort knox on december 26, 1941. First, he has to make the decision, what documents would be there. So he makes this decision very methodically on what is going to go to fort knox. These are considered the most valuable documents in the country. And the magna carta is the document that he has been asked to preserve for the britt for the brits. Tonight on q a. Next, a look at trying to. Top her option we open our phone lines and take a loo ....
Context, where, for example, when we seized 800 million in Swiss Bank Accounts that belonged to the corrupt uzbeki official in the silicon case, there was one claimant to that money, the government of uzbekistan. So we see that. Thats obviously something that the people who were involved in the wrongdoing were associated with the government of uzbekistan. So we wouldnt necessarily be willing to agree to give the money back to them, because they might put it back in a different pocket. So in the hypocrisy context, thats a typical thing where whatever government, whatever the constitution was, that government will claim an interest in the funds. So we do deal with that. We generally fight that. We recognize the entire government is not corrupt and that the government itself was a victim, in some way, of the corruption of this official but we try to work to get the money, to the extent we are giving money back to the country, we ....
When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. That moves them in one direction and also moves them in the same direction if there are a handful of men who might benefit. If there were millions of men who might benefit they might get worried about what they are doing particularly since they are discriminating more against the married couple. I was interested in those questions, but i take it you have said what you can say on that. All you can say ....