Call of the sfpuc to order it is one 37 madam secretary can you please take the roll commissioner Vice President moran commissioner caen commissioner courtney commissioner kwon everybody is present we have quorum thank you. Next speaker, please. Next item is approve the minutes of february 9, 2016, a motion to approve the minutes. 70 second questions or comments Public Comment on the minutes hearing none. All in favor, say i. I. Opposed . The minutes passes unanimously next item, please. Item 4 general Public Comment. Mr. Da costa good afternoon. Good afternoon, commissioners so im here to speak on a number of issues i am very interested in getting a set of salutation on the water Improvement Project especially mountain tunnel and then im very interested in knowing about our water pipes the city some one miles plus in view what is happening in flint im not saying to make a comparison a detailed comparison but we need to know how many of our led pipes are removed and what data is availa
70 second questions or comments Public Comment on the minutes hearing none. All in favor, say i. I. Opposed . The minutes passes unanimously next item, please. Item 4 general Public Comment. Mr. Da costa good afternoon. Good afternoon, commissioners so im here to speak on a number of issues i am very interested in getting a set of salutation on the water Improvement Project especially mountain tunnel and then im very interested in knowing about our water pipes the city some one miles plus in view what is happening in flint im not saying to make a comparison a detailed comparison but we need to know how many of our led pipes are removed and what data is available because you know we are ending coming to the end of at water system Improvement Projects cannot take anything for granted for example, the salutation on the mountain tunnel but now were Fourth Street to expand maybe over one hundred millions that is taxpayers money on the southeast you may know that is no longer it has been mov
I am excited to meet her. I know. And they would have to put in on a spreadsheet each of the 500 or 600 applicants and each one has to be tracked and it is not a pretty sight and what they will do is take the 500 that they pulled the 500 left after they went through housing and the applications to get People Housing and then we will keep that waiting list for at least 3 years and every year they will contact the people on the waiting list and ask them if they are still interested in being on the waiting list and if folks dont get back to them or if they say, no, i am not than the list get shorter and shorter. Then after the 3 years we go to replenish that list. The public will be able to apply again to get on the waiting list. But, for the 4000 and all of those other applicants you know, they have to put their name in the hat the next time. They have to keep applying. Name in the hat the next time. They have to keep applying. That is 500 that will be sort of the priority and they are o
Will see that this is our best guess it is running through the issues and returning through how long that will take and proposed prioritization on page 7 our sense of based on the commissions disconnection and our understanding and we have this abstraction or technician limitations language at the end is this calendar which gives a sense of where everything in gray staff will be working on the issue and anytime it talks about the intent the commission decide on something or hear something at this point so just unthrough briefly it is sort of in the memo but we essentially had the 4 issues that were voted on the mechanic and prohibition triggered by the prop j issues and getting those foiled with the Ethics Commission weve identified some the procedural issues and the two that we identified were sort of enforcement policies and regulations addressing some of the streamline provisions maybe forms inspections for any reason violations that sort of thing and the second thing under the proc
You outstanding issues out there i thought we thought that would be good for the commission to see all the issues and then make a decision based on that full information receive input if the public with respect to everybody is on the on the same page as to who is out there approximately, how long things will take and when the work were trying to get it done by what we did was added the additional issues were aware of and put that into the memo and so we know number one tried to lay out what the additional issues are and given e give an estimate how long each one my take who talked with the City Attorneys Office and particularly with respect to building a record as to the kind of controlled Committee Issues and we tried to figure out well, what is the most important and how would we prioritize those a lot of this was us trying to take the cow from the commission but also kind of looking at what we saw the serious issues it is a mix not perfected you folks will see that this is our best