have told you in past, he had two major defeats with public corru corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, it it says: so he takes a brib bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set f forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, d does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did joc jack the r ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed positively to th
have told you in past, h d two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it it says: so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed
have told you in past, he had two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it it says: so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contribu
understatement, redacted, we are learning some new details about the fbi justification for the search of the former president s home. sandra: one part reading after initial review of the nra referral, the fbi opened a criminal investigation to, among other things, determine how the documents with one classification marking and records were removed from the white house or any other authorized locations for the storage of classified materials, and came to be stored at the premises. john: david spunt is live at the justice department, 38 pages in total released in regard to this, including some attachments. so far we are getting an idea what the documents were or at least the category in which they fell. but we are not getting a lot in terms of the why they thought it was so urgent to go in there and unprecedented fashion and the fbi conduct a raid of mar-a-lago. david: john and sandra, that is the detail we have wanted to know since we first learned agents were going in
About to stall at four seconds prior tomorrow pact. We know at the next second one pilot first called to abort the landing. Now, that investigators in washington had more time to listen to the cockpit voice recordings they added more detail to the nine seconds of the flight. Rather than just one call for a go aaround there were two. They came seconds after the voice recorder shows the pilot first noticed speed had fallen this, was at 100 feet nine seconds to impact. Three seconds before impact there is a call for a go around. There is a second call for a go around at 1. 5 seconds prior to impact. And this call is made by a different crew member. The chair woman suggests a bright light did not affect his ability to fly. The pilot stated he was able to see the cockpit instruments. Saying the group studying the data recorder covered 220 of the 1400 pieces of data. And there is no n sign of problem autos there is no behavior of the auto pilot, of the flight director, and of the auto thrott