Im Jesse Watters on the Judge Jeanine pirro, jessica tarlov, dana perino, and Greg Gutfeld. Its 5 00 in new york city, and this is The Five. Is kamala getting cocky . The vp must think she is untouchable after the liberal press praised her Debate Performance, so her team is ready to ditch the Training Wheels and let her fly solo. A new Harris Campaign Memo laying out how shell be doing more Media Interviews, including with unconventional outlets. And get her out on the campaign trail. The logic here is that the more kamala the better. What could go wrong . Donald trump intends to end the affordable care act. He has no plan to replace it. [laughter] he said he said [laughs] concepts of a plan. [laughs] jesse yikes be at harris is so confident that she crushed it in the debate, she wants another one. I believe we owe it to the voters to have another debate. I said it then. I say it now. Its time to turn the page. [cheers and applause] turn that page. Turn that page. Jesse but trump sayin
But when folks review the numbers, hire the spec highly respected folks, thats what you learned about him. Thats what you learn. And North Carolina Top of all this Donald Trump intends to end the affordable Care Act. And as stacy mentioned, you heard what he said in the Debate Khaki has no plan to replace it. [laughter] he said of a plan. You all watched the debate . [laughter] [cheering] no actual plan contest. And understand whats at stake. 45 Million americans are insured to do the affordable Care Act and hes going to end it based on a concept. And take us back to when Insurance Companies had the power to deny people with preexisting conditions. Well we are not going back. We are not going back. We are not going back. No. We will move forward. We will move forward because ours is a Fight For The Future and its a fight for freedom [cheering and applause] like the fundamental freedom of a woman to make decisions about her own body and not have a government tell her what to do [cheerin
Point six cut and i think it supports a 25 point cut next week. A ~ ,. Supports a 25 point cut next week. ~ ,. , , week. Markets have been volatile week. Markets have been volatile. Will week. Markets have been volatile. Will an week. Markets have been volatile. Will an interest | week. Markets have been i volatile. Will an interest rate cuts stabilise things? cuts stabilise things? since the beginning cuts stabilise things? since the beginning of cuts stabilise things? since the beginning of this cuts stabilise things? since the beginning of this year | cuts stabilise things? since the beginning of this year i | the beginning of this year i think what it will require is coming a financial market and it needs stabilisation in the us labour market and easing of policy and uncertainty around the us presidential election. Run sweet speaking with me a little earlier. Speaking of the us presidential debate, shares in trump media slumped on us markets. It runs the former president tr
Point cut and i think it supports a 25 point cut next week. Did you see any potential policy shifts at the debate? they had a lot of political rhetoric but not a lot of policy information. We already know were both candidates stand on addressing inflation. We ran a number of scenarios through our models to gauge what the inflationary implications are for each of the candidate policies ranging from trade, immigration, taxes and generally form a president trump would be more inflationary than vice president harris because of the tariffs which are inflationary. On top of that stricter immigration leads to tighter labour markets and stronger nominal wage growth in the united states which by extension would raise inflation a little bit. Not a lot of new information last night, just that the political focuses bringing inflation down but the policies the next few years say otherwise. Markets have been volatile. Will an interest rate cuts stabilise things? since the beginning of this year i |
That. Rate cut next week. Everyone seems to be talking about inflation because of the us president ial debate, if you watch that, did you see the potential Policy Shifts based on the candidate s . Mat on the Candidate S . Not reall , on the Candidate S . Not really. They on the Candidate S . Not really, they had on the Candidate S . Not really, they had a on the Candidate S . Not really, they had a lot on the Candidate S . Not really, they had a lot of| really, they had a lot of political rhetoric but not a lot of policy information. We already kind of know where both candidates stand on addressing inflation, i would candidates stand on addressing inflation, Iwould Run candidates stand on addressing inflation, i would run a candidates stand on addressing inflation, Iwould Run a number of scenarios through our macro model to kind of gauge what the inflationary implications are ranging from trade, government spending, taxes, generally, former President Trump would be more inflationary t