Sweden s Nato Membership: The inclusion of Sweden and Finland into Nato s ranks is among the most significant geopolitical consequences of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s actions in Ukraine.
its heels country like turkey which dug its heels and against sweden joining its heels and against sweden joining nato until the last minute, saying, of its own volition minute, saying, of its own volition president erdogan said. volition president erdogan said, ukraine should become a member said, ukraine should become a member of nato. ian is correct, the mood member of nato. ian is correct, the mood is member of nato. ian is correct, the mood is very different from a year the mood is very different from a year ago the mood is very different from a year ago and firmly in sopport a year ago and firmly in support of ukraine. | a year ago and firmly in support of ukraine. i want to ask ou support of ukraine. i want to ask you both support of ukraine. i want to ask you both because - support of ukraine. i want to ask you both because you . support of ukraine. i want to l ask you both because you have both written about the fact you would support ukraine s membership in
our military support for ukraine. tonight, ukraine s president was given a seat at nato s table. ..for dinner at least. the spat over membership aside, this relationship is close. katya adler, bbc news, vilnius. president biden met one on one with turkey s president tayyip erdogan on the sidelines of the summit. there was little mentioned about turkey s agreement allowing sweden tojoin nato, but mr biden did congratulate his counterpart on the critical deal. the two leaders focused on strengthening ties between the countries, with mr erdogan saying a new process had been initiated. in the meeting, the presidents discussed efforts to strengthen bilateral cooperation building on previous talks for the countries to work together strategically. they covered regional issues of shared diplomatic interest, which includes their commitment to support ukraine both militarily in theirwaragainst russia, preserving stability in the aegean region which included exchanging views
that are not in nato tends to get attacked by russia, the case with georgia and ukraine twice now, if you look at the baltics, far more vulnerable than ukraine they have not been touched because they have the security from nato membership. we have left ukraine in a grey zone too long of european security, grey zones attract violence and aggression, they have catalysed food s hegemonic aspirations into violence, twice now, so we should learn that we should be moving decisively to eliminate these grey zones with european security. grey zones with european security- grey zones with european security. how to do that if there was security. how to do that if there was a security. how to do that if there was a time - security. how to do that if there was a time like - security. how to do that if there was a time like this | security. how to do that if. there was a time like this it wouldn t that give russia the ability to prolong the war as long as possible to prevent ukraine from joinin