Maria good morning, big show this morning, coming up mit professor of oh economics and obamacare architect is here to talk democrat medicare for all professes, International Policy analyst richard here to talk iran, lots to talk about this morning, dont miss a moment of it. Rally underway, joining the conversation fox business Dierdre Bolton and wall street journal Editorial Page Editor James Freeman and host of the secrets of wealthy women podcast veronica dagger. Happy friday. We have a firmer tone this morning, stocks surging earlier in premarket also the highs right now, but still higher as markets continue in rate cut, 2day meeting, july 30 or 31. 25 basis cut and this morning to you i keep thinking of microsoft, what a huge surprise that was the First Time Ever that Cloud Business just rocketed. But stock was left for dead, right, after the eu declared monopoly, its not just a oneman show. Maria leadership has helped the company. Yeah, for sure, i wonder why is it a 90 chance of
I do believe the riskiest fossil fuels are easily identifiable youve gotten rid of some of them already. And there are others that can be done in a more immediate fashion. And in how many weve sold in the thermal area, what, Nine Companies . Right. Restricted. Okay. Thats what were looking to build on right now. How many people have come to you and said, weve divested and we made a mistake . Or we wanted to slow it down, if we had a chance to resell . Walk me through none of our signatories whatever divestment theyve done. Its important to differentiate. If you divest from all fossil fuels and you do that tomorrow, thats different than selling off two Coal Companies or whatever it is. So i think what ill say is that every signatory thats taken some kind of divestment action, has done it in a thought out, procedural way and not a reactive, getridofthistomorrow way. I can safely say that, right . Thank you. Thats helpful. Are we on time . Behind. Shall we go to alan or do you have more q
To create kind of a ball of charge. So the model was knowledge in a valid charge. These churches interact with themselves using the photons and if you calculate this using direct theories, which was developed in the 1930s are late 1920s and early 1930s, behaviors ranging their which is like dividing one by zero on a calculator. You didnt answer at infinity. That cant be right because the amount of energy of an electron which if you consider to be a ball of charge cant be infinity. Many different calculations give you an answer of infinity which is very unsatisfying. Its a crazy answer. In order to address this, however radical idea and set the problem youre getting an affinity with these answers could be eliminated if you eliminate the intermediary. You eliminate having a photon or a light particle exchange between the two electrons. We all know that there is like a pair. The play would be produced by the electrons themselves through their mutual interactions, which would take place ov
Impact of fossil fuel usage. Second, the committee is encourages by the sixpoint recommendation for taking action on this topic, but would like to request more information regarding specific timelines for each of the action items lefted in the staff plan. The committee would like to communicate their grave concern regarding the possibility of a mass divestment of fossil fuels within a short time frame. The committee would advocate that the board undertake no such rash action until completing a complete analysis of the Financial Impact the effect it would have on pension performance and costs. We appreciate and understand the desire to divest from fossil fuels from different entities, but we must understand the implications of such a decision before its made. Sorry. Time. Thank you very much. Again, everyone has 1 minute. Were going to announce loudly when you are at your 1minute mark. Understand the constraints we have. Sara greenwald, are you present . Seeing shes not here. I will set
That we double up in this category then . You are a consultant. You are giving us advice for now and in the future. So if you believe its going to go up, why was that not in the recommendation that came before the board . Everybody in this room needs to understand that you hold securities in two places. You give them to managers and those managers make the decision on if the security is attractively valued or not. As a consultant, why dont you recommend us investing more money in the field if you think its going to go up . Were not recommending adding Additional Energy to the portfolio unless a manager hired to make that recommendation determines that thats what they should do. Were arguing that you dont take away that choice from them. The figures i quoted to you do not embed an expectation that Energy Prices will increase. What they do embed is taking energy away diversifies the portfolio. You made a statement that were making a political statement. Could you please back that up . My