last night asked that investigators regain access to 125 documents found in that search of mar-a-lago. that is part of the extraordinary appeal to cannon s order which politico puts like this, it aims to a full-throated rebuke of the ruling by cannon, a trump appointee who was confirmed to a seat after trump s defeat in the 2020 election. prosecutors used the filing to describe her ruling as a danger to national security and one ignorant to the counterintelligence work and lacking in an understanding of the complexities of executive privilege. all of it and the bid to continue to use the classified documents from mar-a-lago in the investigation amounts to a bold gamut from doj. once again, from politico, quote, they re going forward with an appeal despite the risk of cementing an awful precedent. we re getting an even worse ruling from an appeals court dominated by trump appointees and they re daring cannon to double down on analysts that legal analysts on the right and left
measure of just the hundred classified documents. there s some reporting, charlie, i want to read about what it appears to be the least legally sophisticated argument for people like me. she plain, straight up didn t understand what executive privilege was or is, and it sounds like trump wants his modified concern path back, he can have it and is the washington. reporter:ing. with less than two years, jinl cannon does not have a record record to review while presenting untested questions to shield sensitive communications from disclosure may be applied to past occupants of the white house in conflict with their successors. former senor russ feingold who leads the constitution society which closely tracks judicial
nominations says trump in his republican allies sought out judicial nominees like cannon showing an overwhelming preference for individuals often lacking the experience previously considered necessary to sit on the bench. this reporting, i think, makes clear that she was targeted by truck and i m not nearing anything close to sympathy. she made her own bed and she gets to lie it in now and it s laying bare at trump s cravenness. also, look, i think it is very heartening that the department of justice did not blink in the face of a visibly bad decision. 24 decision wasn t even workman like and it exposes the flaw in her legal reasoning and understanding. i don t think the department of justice had any any choice other than to appeal that ruling. it s also an indication that they regarded the stakes as so high that they couldn t let
11th circuit which by the way is stacked with judges with considerably more legal experience and acumen than judge cannon. i want to switch gears. i want it show you what congresswoman zoe lofgren had to say and it was at the january 6th committee and we now learned that doj is potentially investigating for fraud the trump super pac that raised money off the lie. i want to put to you another question about whether this is just a slower, more opaque process at doj or whether some of the evidence presented by the 1/6 committee has helped shape or direct some of their leads. let s watch that first. every american is entitled and encouraged to participate in our electoral process. political fund-raising is part of that. small dollar donors use scarce disposable income to support
last night asked that investigators regain access to 125 documents found in that search of mar-a-lago. that is part of the extraordinary appeal to cannon s order which politico puts like this, it aims to a full-throated rebuke of the ruling by cannon, a trump appointee who was confirmed to a seat after trump s defeat in the 2020 election. prosecutors used the filing to describe her ruling as a danger to national security and one ignorant to the counterintelligence work and lacking in an understanding of the complexities of executive privilege. all of it and the bid to continue to use the classified documents from mar-a-lago in the investigation amounts to a bold gamut from doj. once again, from politico, quote, they re going forward with an appeal despite the risk of cementing an awful precedent.