When considering the nature of the retail. Related to that we need to consider if this is a Retail Destination clogged with traffic with people coming to shop. Is that appropriate for the neighborhood . The proposed lengths of time for the project. I have a 6 yearold daughter. When i saw 15 yearold timeframe my daughter will be a junior in college when this is finished. That is mind bo mindboggling. 15 years of disruption to the neighborhood for that amount of time, i would argue this is not a fair or equitable or just or project to the neighbors currently living there. Lack of affordable is a justice and equity issue. We cant solve that in a way that is just or equitable to the People Living in the neighborhood. I would ask you look out for the rights of the people in the neighborhood is the retail too much of a destination . Is the timeframe of the project appropriate for the neighborhood. Thank you for looking out for all of San Francisco including this neighborhood in your decision
Flexible retail concerns me. I dont think businesses should be open past 11 00 p. M. In the neighborhood. That was a recent addition. I would like to look out for the interests of the neighborhood when considering the nature of the retail. Related to that we need to consider if this is a Retail Destination clogged with traffic with people coming to shop. Is that appropriate for the neighborhood . The proposed lengths of time for the project. I have a 6 yearold daughter. When i saw 15 yearold timeframe my daughter will be a junior in college when this is finished. That is mind bo mindboggling. 15 years of disruption to the neighborhood for that amount of time, i would argue this is not a fair or equitable or just or project to the neighbors currently living there. Lack of affordable is a justice and equity issue. We cant solve that in a way that is just or equitable to the People Living in the neighborhood. I would ask you look out for the rights of the people in the neighborhood is the
i would like to remind members of the public the commission does not tolerate disruption or outbursts of any time. silencer devices that may sound off during these proceedings. when speaking before the commission, do state your name for the record. i would like to take roll call at this time. [roll call] we expect commissioner richards to be absent today. first on your agenda his consideration of items proposed for continuance. conditional use authorization. it is proposed for continuous to genuine 203rd. and item number two, condominium conversion is proposed for continuous to january 30th. item three a and b. for discretionary review and variance are proposed for continuance to february 27th, 2020. further, under your discretionary review calendar, we have received a request from the supervisor to which the sponsor is amenable, for item 16 to continue item 219 29 at sanchez street discretionary review to february 20th, 2020. i have no other items proposed for continuanc
conversion is proposed for continuous to january 30th. item three a and b. for discretionary review and variance are proposed for continuance to february 27th, 2020. further, under your discretionary review calendar, we have received a request from the supervisor to which the sponsor is amenable, for item 16 to continue item 219 29 at sanchez street discretionary review to february 20th, 2020. i have no other items proposed for continuance and i have no speaker cards. thank you. either any members of the public that would like to comment on the items proposed for continuance? seeing non, public comment is closed. move to continue items one, two, iiia, three b. to the dates proposed including item 16 to february 20th, 2020. second. [roll call] so moved. that motion passes unanimously 6 -0. if the acting zoning administrator could continue item three b. yes, i will continue it until the public february 27th also. thank you. that will place us under your consent ca
The city of San Francisco sfgov tv meeting of the rules committee occurring thursday, september 8, 2016 we will begin shortly. [gavel] hello good morning everyone and welcome to our exciting rules Committee Meeting of thursday, september 8, 2016. Im Grady Katie Tang chairman of the committee and to my left is cohen. Mar will be joining us shortly. From sfgov tv would like to thank charles kremenak. We have any announcements speed tends thank you. Thanks. Please sounds all cell phones [reading ordinance] at this time i think oregon about skip over item 1. If we can go on to item 2 item number two, [reading ordinance] so, this is one of the i guess routine appointments to the reentry counsel and am happy to support supervisor avalos on the. See no other questions or comments on open item number two to Public Comment. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. [gavel] we will do that without objection [gavel] lets call item 35 together item 35 [reading ordinance] great, thank you. So, at this