When considering the nature of the retail. Related to that we need to consider if this is a Retail Destination clogged with traffic with people coming to shop. Is that appropriate for the neighborhood . The proposed lengths of time for the project. I have a 6 yearold daughter. When i saw 15 yearold timeframe my daughter will be a junior in college when this is finished. That is mind bo mindboggling. 15 years of disruption to the neighborhood for that amount of time, i would argue this is not a fair or equitable or just or project to the neighbors currently living there. Lack of affordable is a justice and equity issue. We cant solve that in a way that is just or equitable to the People Living in the neighborhood. I would ask you look out for the rights of the people in the neighborhood is the retail too much of a destination . Is the timeframe of the project appropriate for the neighborhood. Thank you for looking out for all of San Francisco including this neighborhood in your decision
Flexible retail concerns me. I dont think businesses should be open past 11 00 p. M. In the neighborhood. That was a recent addition. I would like to look out for the interests of the neighborhood when considering the nature of the retail. Related to that we need to consider if this is a Retail Destination clogged with traffic with people coming to shop. Is that appropriate for the neighborhood . The proposed lengths of time for the project. I have a 6 yearold daughter. When i saw 15 yearold timeframe my daughter will be a junior in college when this is finished. That is mind bo mindboggling. 15 years of disruption to the neighborhood for that amount of time, i would argue this is not a fair or equitable or just or project to the neighbors currently living there. Lack of affordable is a justice and equity issue. We cant solve that in a way that is just or equitable to the People Living in the neighborhood. I would ask you look out for the rights of the people in the neighborhood is the
the department designed the facade in such a manner as to give it the residential character and disguises function. we recommend a 7:00 a.m. delivery time to address noise impacts. we think that is adequate. the mmrp also includes a parking queue condition to address cuing impacts. we feel the language is more balanced and gives to sponsor a number of options for abating the line. the sponsor has declared but has a note on file that he is working with the mayor s office of housing to find a suitable offsite housing location of the neighborhood to meet the requirements. it is on don hall wholefoods will impact smaller grossers in the neighborhood, but is unknown how whole foods will and have smaller grocers in the neighborhood. it mostly contains a more robust suggestion about how this may or may not impact local grocers. i would refer you to that. in the opinion of the department, this news would complement the safe way that is right across the street this use would compl
activate more of the upper market street neighborhood. one of the concerns has been about affordable housing. when i first met with developers, much of my interest was seen the site. this is where to start out as rental. it is my understanding you are not able to do on-site affordable with a project that starts out as rental. but discussions i have had with the mayor s office of housing have been about obtaining a site. we have not had affordable housing built in my district since the one church project. it is frustrating to me because we certainly need it. we needed to maintain the diversity we have lost, people who were renters when there was a feeding frenzy on to unit buildings because there were outside the condo lottery. on 2 below-unit buildings because there were outside the condo lottery. we need housing. but there are other plots of land. take blockbuster. that is a business model that is close to a dinosaur. it is a gigantic parcel of land on church street. talki
the neighborhood. i am supportive of the idea of adding a land dedication option to the market-are to be a plan. the market octavia plan. in terms of 2001 market street, the product group prado group has been working to provide affordable housing. certain projects have been proposed that convert to ownership. this is a difficult project for on-site inclusionary housing because in many places tenants cannot afford to buy or do not want to buy. the purchasing power is different because the targeting for tenants is 50% and my and the targeting for buyers is 90% am i is 50% ami in the targeting for buyers is 90% ami. prado has been looking for sites for the past two year and will continue to apprise us on ongoing progress. this will be similar to the lan dedication in eastern neighborhoods. this will allow the project sponsor to purchase a site within a defined radius and transfer to the city. then they can offer it to the nonprofit affordable housing provider that meets th