working with the governor and i know your central wanting has met with him with the apprenticeship committee and on the state level we are in load as is regulation passed and come into the regulated system that all the workers exist have protection they know they re right and have these good jobs no matter what happened there will be workings we want the workers to be protected as they community-based introduce the many changes. i was wondering which automobile was stepping up and taking the lead i know the tooerms have been involved i don t know the technology planets i guess. that s material product so, yes there are other units involved. who are they. i believe the usc w and the tooermz are the main unions and in other states seiu. i don t know. i don t of any other questions it s looks like we re done you guys are a lot of work ahead of you, we can roll up our sleeves xhesh if we could make a motion to continue this item we can continue this item. madam chair.
either grammatical or literary additions. one suggested rearrangement of language and one question. on page 4, commissioner could you speak into the microphone? on page 4, under discussion for enforcement and report. the end of the second paragraph there s a reference to ms. blome noted that bdr attempted an assetb search of mr. chris jackson and the court s investigation determined that there are no assets. is the court the right word? do you remember? i didn t think you said court. it should be bdr. good catch. bdr, okay, may i propose that change, mr. chairman? you may. then on page 5, above the words public comment, and maybe should ask what how we phrase this as a customary practice, is present tense or past tense? because that sentence says, the individual commissioners acknowledge in the present tense. and i m going to suggest this change: the individual commissioners acknowledged, and congratulated. of the executive director pelham on her elect
sorry. this is unusual. honestly to be here at this point, for something like this. so, i am going to defer to the executive director on that to let him decide if that will be an acceptable amount. i think that the minimum should be $500 for each count. i am siding with commissioner andrews that it should be $1,000 a count, seems right f we otherwise would settle for $500 a count. and i mean, arguably maybe that is a little too low to have the turn about that we want, but i think that is very reasonable. yeah. and is there a motion, unless there are other comments from the commissioners, maybe we should take the public comment and we will do the motion. s public comment on this matter? david, pilpal speaking as an individual, i did want to note that the commission does have this history of settling matters related to this type of allegation, it did seem from the discussion, like at least, $1,000 a count, or $2,000 total is appropriate given the aggravating fac
commissioner king? you have done a good job in allowing the general public to get into the weeds of things like a general election and in regards to funding an election and who is involved, and the whole aspect of following the money which is or tells so much about government, and the transparency and the lack of transparency of government and that is enormously valuable and i want to ask you a question which may be unfair and if it is, feel free not to answer it. since you have gotten into the weeds and you have seen, how elections and balloting works and where the money is coming from and where it is coming from. have you formed me kind of opinions relating to one way or the other? in regard to the whole process itself? that you would like to share with us? i think that we had, some ideas, just about in the future, being able to track future lobbying money and i think that some of those conclusions will come after the elections and just, after yeah, after we have some
was big and we are going to do exactly what you said, but the reality is, these are human beings filling out forms, and so, it is full of errors and lots of issues, and it takes a lot of time and a lot of work. reality is like that. yeah. okay. thank you. but it is a great work, thank you so much. i can elaborate on the contribution piece a little bit. one of the things going forward, we were working on, is a system that enables outside contributions, and that is one of the reasons why we decided to find our own content, what is called a content management system for hosting our own data sets, so that if you ended up importing this into excel, and did your own analysis, you could give us the data and we could put this on the internet. you know? and sort of under our name and in our system as something that can be, you know, built on that is not necessarily endorsed by the government, but it is part of our organization s effort to make the data more understandabl