at this point, neil, have they not just stated by their actions they re more in favor of right-wing politics, the kind of desantis-style ring-wing politics than in saving lives? they don t care if this causes less people to die, clearly. martha: is that the take-away from the opinions that were written by these justices? parentally. actually, it s more complex than that. the second ruling as you pointed out, cavanaugh sided with john roberts that sided with the liberal justices multiple times on the healthcare side. it s more mixed than that. this is the supreme court version of deathsantis. if you don t do what they like, if you side on the side of freedom, you must be wanting to kill people. like sotomayor and kagan don t have left wing views. we knew who they were when they got appointed. elections have consequences.
trump picked three. as a result, freedom lovers have a shot when things get appealed like with this mandate. martha: it undercuts justice sotomayor s credibility when she says things from the pench that a patently false and didn t take the time to research what she said in order to get that across. i don t understand why that isn t addressed. i guess i do. i want to play a quick clip from this. i was intrigued be i think. it s called the miseducation of america. you re documented in this special the origins and roots of how the slow drift of the way that kids have been taught in this country. here s a quick sound bite of you speaking with dennis craiger. listen. the 1619 project is alive. it s not a different of view. i don t mind differences of view. this is a lie. the america revolution was not taught in order to sustain slavery. that s a lie. your kids are being taught lies. they re indoctrinated, not