don t fire themselves. and if he said it didn t aim it at a new buddy, well, certainly it had to be aimed at somebody else it wouldn t have hit somebody. so he is either lying or was there another gun involved, perhaps? where do we go with this? it s hard to believe. and if alec baldwin thinks this somehow absolves them for potential criminal culpability, he is sorely mistaken. the issue is not whether he pulled the trigger or the gun went off accidentally, which is hard to believe, because this isn t an intent crime that is being investigated, it is a gross negligence crime. so prosecutors are focusing not on the trigger pull, but on the handling of the gun by baldwin prior to the shooting incident. was he grossly negligent and reckless? did he fail to exercise due caution as the law requires to ensure the safety of others? so what is the standard in the industry for actors using guns on the set.
hand, guns don t fire themselves, and he didn t aim it at anybody. it had to be aimed at somebody or else it wouldn t have hit somebody. he s either lying or was there another gun involved perhaps? i mean, where do we go with this? well, it s hard to believe and if alec baldwin thinks that somehow absorbs him from potential criminal culpability he s sorely mistaken. the issue is not whether he pulled the trigger or the gun went off accidentally which is hard to believe because this isn t an intent crime that s being investigated. it s a gross negligence crime, so prosecutors are focusing not on the trigger pull but on the handling of the gun by baldwin prior to the shooting incident. was he grossly negligent? and reckless? did he fail to exercise due caution as the law requires to ensure the safety of others? so what s the standard in the industry for actors using guns