Welcome to hannity and tonight the total most radical and extreme dangerous far left politicians nominated by a major party or hiding in plain sight in front of family crowds with supporters cheering not as big as they are making you think. You have harris and walz leading speeches from scripps other people likely wrote taking zero questions there were no interviews or press conferences or town halls no impromptu gaggles no television appearances not even friendly venues like msnbc. Since her coronation harrises only went off script a onetime for a 32nd word salad about the return of american hostages around 12 or 1:00 in the morning. Neither of them up and asked about the radical positions them in their own words the alleged subsequent flipping and flopping we don t even know for sure if they flipped and flopped we only heard that from their campaign and that was only after harris was presumptive nominee that s called an election year conversion by every definition neither candidate h
the the youngest just nine years old. darnella frazier was 17 when she recorded it and i went viral. here is part of her emotional testimony today. i heard george floyd saying i can t breathe. please get off of me. i can t breathe. he cried for his mom. he was in pain. it seemed like he knew it was over for him. he was terrified. this was a cry for help. when i look at george floyd, i look at my dad. i look at my brothers. i look at my cousins, my uncles because they are all black. i have a black father. i have a black brother. i have black friends. i look at that and i look at how that could have been one of them. it didn t appear that any of today s testimony moved chauvin who was in the courtroom. witness after witness broke down on the stand wishing they had been able to do more for george floyd. it was difficult because i felt like there wasn t really anything i could do as a bystander. the highest power was there. i felt like i was feeling it. genevieve hansen w
to hear a little bit of the crowd that is here outside of the courthouse celebrating this verdict which came after more than 27 hours of deliberation. the panel of six men and six women kim potter guilty of first and second-degree manslaughter. this outcome was by no means a sure thing. just a few days ago, the jury indicated that they may not be able to reach a consensus but with this verdict the jury indicated they believe the former officer was reckless and negligent when shot daunte wright with her gun instead of her taser. in the courtroom, potter showed no emotion as the judge read the jury s decision and she wanted her fate. we, the jury, a charge of manslaughter in the first degree while committing a misdemeanor on or about april 11, 2021 in henneman county we find the defendant guilty. a short time later minnesota prosecuted the casing this verdict brings accountability to daunte wright s death and well pleased with the outcome, his heart goes out to kim potter a
the first republican primary debate. hope the weekend was grand. we have a big week here. i m bill hemmer. dana: i m dana perino. this is america s newsroom. i m excited about the week. are you? bill: big time? dana: are you packed? bill: 50%. dana: i have it all planned out because this is a big week. this morning a big day. brand-new polling out of iowa this morning. a state that is small in size but holds a mighty influence over presidential primaries. voters there give former president trump a solid early advantage in the nation s first nominating contest. you would have to go back more than 20 years to find the last time a candidate held this large of a lead over his rivals among iowa caucus goers. bill: 48 hours from now will be the arena in milwaukee. the center of the political universe and the political event of the summer. the first republican primary duel on stage. it is all going down in battleground state wisconsin. ten electoral votes on the line t
issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest