the lead starts right now. for the first time since the start of britain s war, ukraine will be getting an aid package from the u.s. that includes cluster munitions, bonds that are banned by most countries. president biden gave an exclusive interview where he tried to defend that controversial decision, and the special counsel zeroes in on an oval office meeting during donald trump s final days in office, a meeting described as nuts. follow-up from the exclusive cnn reporting and what it tells us about the investigation into trump in january 6 and a possible third indictment of mr. trump. there then, he survived the taliban and decades of war working as an interpreter in afghanistan during the war, only to be shot and killed while driving a lift in the united states. the latest on the search for suspects. welcome to the lead. we start today with our worldly deadly cluster munitions or bombs, a lethal weapon that can disperse hundreds of smaller explosives over an area up to
and it s not as if she is breaking the law, but she could really have the judge come down on her hard. and she could raise arguments that trump will eventually raise as to tainting the jury pool, that. but the headline here, you know, let s just take a step back. the fulton county da, they clearly recommended the indictment of donald trump, not to mention maybe how do you know that? she has as much as said it. i won t tell you, but the initials are donald trump. when they asked, well, he says he was completely exonerated. she literally rolls her eyes and laughs. there are four different ways in which she really makes it beyond any doubt there is a possibility willis doesn t take her up on the recommendation. but it s a small one. so, yes, absolutely right, she s talking out of school. it s not good for the case. but man, we re going to have for the first time in the history the country a fulton county da s going to indict not just trump, but almost certainly it seems to
look, we are not the nine greatest internet experts that ever lived picks i believe that . it also reflected in a court that is so divided, they were a little that nervous about messing with the mechanics of the internet. and essentially the internet is built on this idea that you and i can post something and the companies cannot be sued for it. so, what happens when we post something about eating disorders or something tuxes or bullies somewhere else. over and over again the courts and congress, to some extent, tend to lead toward free speech. now, i think with the families hope is that this will be kind of a big tobacco moment, that there will be a critical mass of public scrutiny that will draw attention to stories around youths specifically, that will start to put pressure on legislatures to act. we are seeing legislation moving california and utah and montana. it is dovetailing with the nt tick-tock movement some
said should not blind when they are contributing their own stuff when they bring their own stuff to the party. so more accountability. that sounds good right? more accountability for these platforms? nine people on the court as justice kagan says we are not internet experts. the real worry is that if you put it in a could be starting all kinds of lawsuits. and they posed that question to the interstates government they said it s true but, most in one 60. the court is obviously concerned with a field day for lawsuits. i talked to people who were in the courtroom. they actually think google is probably going to win this one, but the main thing that court was thinking is this should be congress s problem. we don t know and i ve got to fix this. please don t bring this to us. i think we re gonna have another case tomorrow, slightly different, but that the final opinion will reflect that kind of congress this is your job.