things legal from the many investigations involving former president trump, to the fight for reproductive freedom and all 50 states. the controversy surrounding the supreme court, we re gonna have some fun too. getting your questions answered, a lot of questions, let s begin with with donald trump and the efforts to hold the former president accountable. for his efforts to support the will of murders in 2020. specifically, fulton county, georgia, district attorney fani willis getting the biggest sign yet that charges are imminent. d a willis has asked her local courthouse not to schedule any hearings or trials for a seventh. to the 14th, you might put those daytona calendars too. after putting law enforcement on, alert saying she plans to announce indictments in the trump investigation by september 1st. this as a new witness comes forward, alleging trump s dream discuss stealing the election as early as 2019. she says she worked for rudy giuliani, had access to thousands of h
for staying up with me. if you if you were brave enough to open the new york times this morning and you turned to the opinion section, this is what you would ve seen. thomas friedman, joe biden is a good man and a good president, he must bow out of the race. ■ç frank bruni, biden cannot go on like this. nicholas kristof, president biden, i ve seen enough. this evening, the entire editorial board of the new york times published this op-ed, to serve his country, president biden should leave the race. mr. biden answered urgent question on thursday night, it was not the answer he and his supporters were hoping for. if the risk of a second from term is as great as he says it is, his dedication leaves him and his party only one choice, the clearest path for democrats to defeat a candidate defined by his life is to deal truthfully with the american public. acknowledge that mr. biden cannot continue his race and try to process to select someone more capable to stand in his pla
was just a mistake, this was an administrative boo-boo, and turns that into a crime. the willful removal of classified documents s criminal. that s against the law. but it also leads to the possibility of instruction charges if it shows that he knowing that the authorities wanted to return these documents, he had been notified, and still didn t do that. that rises to the level of obstruction. so in both cases, this evidence could make things more serious. what is particularly relevant, when you have republicans making the case that lots of people have taken these documents. that taking of the documents is one piece of this. it is not the most nefarious pizza of this. it isn t. and that law became effective right after the administration, to make sure that people weren t misusing documents and taking them. that they belonged to the people. they belonged to the government. and so taking them is a crime. it s just not prosecuted as much when there is an added element, either as kim me