officials for the last 14 months. let s bring an wall street journal columnist editor, dan henninger and editorial page writer, adam. adam, you follow this more than a year. why did the biden administration do the quick reversal this week? what s driving this? i think they are starting to recognize and they have from the beginning the administration, the previous administration has gotten good intelligence that made a lovely seemed like a plausible theory and they couldn t reject it so i m told the state investigation being moved around was bureaucratic wrangling but the important thing the intelligence community is going to be overseeing that. paul: so we have, what have we learned in the last year, adam? what is the best evidence we have for the lab theory? the one particular incriminating piece of information the state department put out in january was that there were researchers who had symptoms consistent with covid at the wuhan institute of virology in autumn 2019
a year on from the storming of capitol hill in america, president biden is to caution against political violence becoming the norm. and the social media phenomenon pinkpantheress wins the bbc s sound of 2022. and in sport: a five wicket haul for stuart broad is the only highlight for england down under as australia take control of the fourth ashes test. good afternoon and welcome to the bbc news at one. men s tennis world number one novak djokovic is in a dramatic stand off with the authorities in australia after having his visa revoked on his arrival in melbourne for the first grand slam tournament of the year. djokovic, who has said he is opposed to vaccination, gained a medical exemption by tennis australia from having to be double jabbed against covid. but it was rejected by federal authorities on his arrival there, and he now faces deportation following a huge backlash in the country over the original exemption. djokovic is currently in a government detention hotel
sexual abuse by chinese official. huge group of officials organizes themselves and they want to go loot a store. do you think that s because of the pandemic. i think a root cause in a lot of comiewfnts is the pandemic, yes. bollard and there he goes. down the sideline, jets are on, touchdown dallas. rocking around the christmas tree at the chris party hop this is the home where can you see every couple tries to stop rocking around the christmas tree brian: you know, seeing that tree reminds me that i m at work and special like hanging out the window and shooting that it s cold in the winter. ainsley: is he repelling from that building. brian: a lot of people don t that shift but we have that guy. we have a christmas schedule that airs sunday 10:00 hairs on fox news and simultaneously fox nation. we are able to be the three anchors that toss around to important people and important events and put together a christmas special that many people thinks rivals the kin
it s not only that he was involved in some of the key disputes that we ve heard about within the administration, apparently, but also that is decision to testify saw something about the privilege claims of other people off that they wouldn t. that is a very good point. and he appears and scenes and robert costa s book about this period in the very dramatic scenes and the white house. that the committee already knows about. they ve already read the book, they rarely spoken to other people who are in and around those moments. and so, a lot of this could just be confirming information. but also, a certain amount of this testimony could be trying to make sure that he is not included on the suspect list of people who are committing crimes at the time. yeah, i mean, it s one thing to have anonymous sources or third-party source, or an anonymous narrator in your book describe your behavior in a confrontation over whether or not a crime could be committed, right? it s another
knows about. they ve already read the book, they rarely spoken to other people who are in and around those moments. and so, a lot of this could just be confirming information. but also, a certain amount of this testimony could be trying to make sure that he is not included on the suspect list of people who are committing crimes at the time. yeah, i mean, it s one thing to have anonymous sources or third-party source, or an anonymous narrator in your book describe your behavior in a confrontation over whether or not a crime could be committed, right? it s another thing for you to be able to speak on your own terms about that. with all of these, you always want to be a fly on a wall, but pat sublot me testifying as the one i m most want to be in. this would be in a good one. we will see. thank you rachel. thank you. in what could be the most important recent poll about the future of american politics and the future of american democracy, we have the strongest evidence ye