here s an idea, on security footage, bladder the faces of the folks invading the capital on january 6th so authorities cannot track them down. guess who said that today? the league starts right now. they have participated in the events of that day, we don t want them to be retaliated against. to be charged by the doj. what? that is speaker of the house, you like to stand in the way, the way we identify criminals. now his office is revising those remarks plus how federal prosecutors plan to use donald trump has continued support. the rest of the presidents in court, warnings of an apocalyptic situation in gaza as israel takes intense deadly aim. welcome to the lead with jake tapper, we start with our law and justice. the new impact of the january 6th insurrection on trumps legal and political future. federal prosecutors say they plan to use drums continued with these lawbreakers against him at trial. the justice department saying the fact that trump continues to celebrat
she s a senior there. and the title of this piece is the doctrine of academic freedom. let s give up on academic freedom in favor of justice. she s a woman studying gender and equality. here s what she says, sexism and heterosexism, why should we put up with research that counters our goal simply in the name of academic freedom? instead, i would like to propose a more rigorous standard, one of academics justice when an academic community observes research promoting or justifies oppression, it should ensure that this research does not continue. in other words, the truth when it is inconvenient should be squelched. there s a name for this, it s called fascism. after four years in harvard, you conclude, or she has, that the truth when inconvenient, aught to be suppressed. if she had absolute power, how