Stay updated with breaking news from I dont live in dc . Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Going to pull any punches and they re going to have to sit there for it. nobody outside the beltway of d.c. cares about the dopey shutdown. i don t live in d.c. and i just find it hilarious when people who live in this city just freak out about it as though it s the end of the world. i have to say nancy pelosi, let s cut to the chase. she is scared to death it will be a nightmare for her politically. they never thought trump would push the shut down to where it would interfere with the state of the union. he now has a bully pulpit. he is going to go on there. the gallery will be filled with angel mothers, people whose children were murdered by illegal immigrants. the scary thing for nancy pelosi is that this would take place, this will be a political nightmare for schumer and pelosi. she knows she will do anything to stop it. shannon: i bet some of the 800,000 furloughed federal workers will be there as guests ....
Decision does he want to veto that or accept it. right now the white house wants to see if their theory is correct that the cuts will be so painful it will force republicans to go to the negotiating table. we don t know if that is going to happen. if might not. i want to pick up with you. in a sense, aren t both sides taking a chance here if the white house is right and it is painful and kids get thrown out of head start and it quarterbacks intolerable to go through airports are voters going to blame republicans and say, once again, they are protecting the wealthy at the expense of the middle class? conversely if the republicans are right and 2 isn t that painful might voters say we can shrink the government and it doesn t kill things? i don t live in d.c. and surprised when i come back here that only in this town could a 3% spending cut, 85 billion touchdown year. rich lowery. national review. right said it is going to be more closer to $45 billion. only could a 3% cut sound t ....
Decision does he want to veto that or accept it. right now the white house wants to see if their theory is correct that the cuts will be so painful it will force republicans to go to the negotiating table. we don t know if that is going to happen. if might not. i want to pick up with you. in a sense, aren t both sides taking a chance here if the white house is right and it is painful and kids get thrown out of head start and it quarterbacks intolerable to go through airports are voters going to blame republicans and say, once again, they are protecting the wealthy at the expense of the middle class? conversely if the republicans are right and 2 isn t that painful might voters say we can shrink the government and it doesn t kill things? i don t live in d.c. and surprised when i come back here that only in this town could a 3% spending cut, 85 billion touchdown year. rich lowery. national review. right said it is going to be more closer to $45 billion. only could a 3% cut sound t ....
That or accept it. right now the white house wants to see if their theory is correct that the cuts will be so painful it will force republicans to go to the negotiating table. we don t know if that is going to happen. if might not. i want to pick up with you. in a sense, aren t both sides taking a chance here if the white house is right and it is painful and kids get thrown out of head start and it quarterbacks intolerable to go through airports are voters going to blame republicans and say, once again, they are protecting the wealthy at the expense of the middle class? conversely if the republie rigt painful might voters say we can shrink the government and it doesn t kill things? i don t live in d.c. and surprised when i come back here that only in this town could a 3% spending cut, 85 billion touchdown year. rich lowery. national review. right said it is going to be more closer to $45 billion. only could a 3% cut sound that bad if wag, washington. ....