Stay updated with breaking news from Cut sound. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
for the first time and he was like whoa! true, it s been a while since the supreme court treated the constitution as anything but a paper powell for when biden spills his ensure and the reason for the change is also the reason for tonight s monologue. it s been over 150 years since america banned slavery but here s an interesting fact that folks at reuters just dug up. i love reuters. a lot of powerful people descended from slave owners. that includes republicans, mitch mcconnell. i would say he took one on the chin, but we all know that s not possible. [laughter] greg: but also lindsey graham, james langford and tom cotton. his name sort of gave that away. [laughter] greg: if you ever run for president should not use the slogan pick cotton. not going to work in the cities. [laughter] i would not advise that either. greg: all right. if those old white men didn t surprise you, how about tammy duckworth, jean and liz warren, right? that s got to be tough for tho ....
[applause] greg: yes. it s greg s animal friends. a brand-new segment, where each guest shares a video of an amazing creature. of course, it could be misbehaving and doing something cute, the only rule, the videos can t be crappy unless they are crapping. todd, do you have one? i ve got a cow. greg: is with it a duck? no, a cow by itself and i feel that the article that described what happened with this cow defamed said cow. greg: really. can we roll the cow? greg: cut sound. here s what happened. they described the cow as aggressive. does that look like an aggressive kowtow. he s prancing. the best line from the article, though, i had to read this multiple times because we re all reading from our papers tonight, officials reported the cow appeared unfamiliar with the area and disoriented, heading ....
Decision does he want to veto that or accept it. right now the white house wants to see if their theory is correct that the cuts will be so painful it will force republicans to go to the negotiating table. we don t know if that is going to happen. if might not. i want to pick up with you. in a sense, aren t both sides taking a chance here if the white house is right and it is painful and kids get thrown out of head start and it quarterbacks intolerable to go through airports are voters going to blame republicans and say, once again, they are protecting the wealthy at the expense of the middle class? conversely if the republicans are right and 2 isn t that painful might voters say we can shrink the government and it doesn t kill things? i don t live in d.c. and surprised when i come back here that only in this town could a 3% spending cut, 85 billion touchdown year. rich lowery. national review. right said it is going to be more closer to $45 billion. only could a 3% cut sound t ....
Decision does he want to veto that or accept it. right now the white house wants to see if their theory is correct that the cuts will be so painful it will force republicans to go to the negotiating table. we don t know if that is going to happen. if might not. i want to pick up with you. in a sense, aren t both sides taking a chance here if the white house is right and it is painful and kids get thrown out of head start and it quarterbacks intolerable to go through airports are voters going to blame republicans and say, once again, they are protecting the wealthy at the expense of the middle class? conversely if the republicans are right and 2 isn t that painful might voters say we can shrink the government and it doesn t kill things? i don t live in d.c. and surprised when i come back here that only in this town could a 3% spending cut, 85 billion touchdown year. rich lowery. national review. right said it is going to be more closer to $45 billion. only could a 3% cut sound t ....
That or accept it. right now the white house wants to see if their theory is correct that the cuts will be so painful it will force republicans to go to the negotiating table. we don t know if that is going to happen. if might not. i want to pick up with you. in a sense, aren t both sides taking a chance here if the white house is right and it is painful and kids get thrown out of head start and it quarterbacks intolerable to go through airports are voters going to blame republicans and say, once again, they are protecting the wealthy at the expense of the middle class? conversely if the republie rigt painful might voters say we can shrink the government and it doesn t kill things? i don t live in d.c. and surprised when i come back here that only in this town could a 3% spending cut, 85 billion touchdown year. rich lowery. national review. right said it is going to be more closer to $45 billion. only could a 3% cut sound that bad if wag, washington. ....