it s called christ of the ozarks. christ of the ozarks was the subject of a huge a suspiciously huge fund-raising operation by gerald l.k. smith. he died in 1976, but that statue still stands 1 in arkansas toda. but gerald l.s. smith is about to have another moment in the public eye because what he really wanted to be remembered for, even more than that statue, was a nationwide movement that he tried to build, a movement that he named and that he led and that he promoted tirelessly and that he wanted to outlive him forever. the motive behind the term christian nationalist is easy to define and simple to interpret. we believe that the destiny of america in relationship to its governing authority must be kept in thein hands of our own peopl. we must never be goonchd by aliens. we must keep control of our own money m and our own blood. in other words, we must remain trueor to the declaration of independence. that is nationalism. woe believe that the spiritual symbol of our s
forgiven. he is no longer a famous figure. but in his day, he was a famous fish guy. a preacher and political figure. at one point, he ran for senate in michigan as a republican. in 1944, he ran for president against fdr. he ran for the ticket on the america first party, which he had founded. gerald l k smith did not go far with that bid or the bid as a republican. either if gerald l k smith, is remembered for anything, today it is probably mostly for this, this is a statue that he erected in arkansas in the 1960s, it is called christ of the ozarks. crisis of the ozarks was a suspiciously huge fund raising operation by gerald l.k. smith. he died in 1976. but that statue still stands in arkansas today. but gerald l.k. smith is about to have another moment in the public eye. because what he really wanted to be remembered for, even more than that statue, was a nation wide movement that he tried to build. a movement that he named and that he lied and that he promoted charsley. an
fundraising operation, he died in 1976 but that statue still stands in arkansas today. but he is about to have another moment in the public eye. because what he really wanted to be remembered for, even more than that statue, was a nationwide movement that he tried to build. a movement that he named. and that he led. and that he promoted tirelessly. and that he wanted to outlive him. the motive behind the term christian nationalist is easy to define and simple to interpret. we believe that the destiny of america in relationship to its governing authority must be kept in the hands of our own people. we must never be governed by anyone. we must keep control of our own money and our own blood. in other words, we must remain true to the declaration of independence. that is nationalism. we believe that the spiritual symbol of our statesmanship is the cross, which indeed is the symbol of christianity. we believe that the inspiring dynamic out of which america grew is christianity.
cup. but the influence he had after he retired, his association with the club so important we are just seeing pictures of the funeral procession is well arriving at old trafford, where you can see hundreds have gathered. the under ratings and the under 21 gel forming a guard of armour. , h, y under 21 gel forming a guard of armour. , ,., , ., armour. everybody will turn out because everybody armour. everybody will turn out because everybody had - armour. everybody will turn out because everybody had so - armour. everybody will turn out| because everybody had so much respect for the man. it is a great tribute in itself. we all know that there will be thousands at old trafford and here at the cathedral. it will be an unbelievable sendoff, which is well deserved. h0??? it will be an unbelievable sendoff, which is well deserved. it will be an unbelievable sendoff, which is well deserved. how do you relate to the which is well deserved. how do you relate to the current whic
u.s. is capable of shipping them a lot more? i don t know much about these weapons in terms of the procurement process, from what i ve able to read, sort of open source stuff, it seems like they re $5 million a pop. there s open source estimates that maybe the u.s. has a few hundred of them in our arsenal. but they ve been around for decades. they ve been around since the 90s. it s not like their brand-new, highly precision, s weapon systems that we ve only got a handful of. do you think we are capable of giving them as anymore as they want? no, not as many more as they want. and when you re talking about hundreds upon hundreds, the planners at the pentagon have to make sure that we don t cut into bone for u.s. defenses, right? that we don t leave ourselves vulnerable. we are giving the green is a lot of different things, including himars, and so, the pentagon has to make decisions all the time on what we can get them from our engine tory, to other partner nations have similar system