arrogance of the globalist ruling class who think it s their moral duty to ignore democracy and instead run the world according to whatever makes life easier for the ruthless and heartless global corporations that macron and his gang of elitists serve. and they have the nerve to lecture president trump about morality. one last point on all of this. i was reading this book, what is the constitution with one of my sons this week. it tells a story of the constitution and here is something that caught my eye. some leaders like george washington, james madison and alexander hamilton wanted the united states to be a strong nation with a solid central government, one that would oversee all of the states. these leaders were call nationalists. alexander hamilton was a nationalist. that might convince the elite that there is really nothing wrong with putting your country
arrogance of the globalist ruling class who think it s their moral duty to ignore democracy and instead run the world according to whatever makes life easier for the ruthless and heartless global corporations that macron and his gang of elitists serve. and they have the nerve to lecture president trump about morality. one last point on all of this. i was reading this book, what is the constitution with one of my sons this week. it tells a story of the constitution and here is something that caught my eye. some leaders like george washington, james madison and alexander hamilton wanted the united states to be a strong nation with a solid central government, one that would oversee all of the states. these leaders were call nationalists. alexander hamilton was a nationalist. that might convince the elite that there is really nothing
look back to the original understanding. that informs us. or in the fifth amendment, just stevens in aprendy, wrote a very fine examination of the original history of the constitution, and said it s not right that an individual should be sentenced to prison, hand sentence on a base of facts a jury hasn t found. those are all originalist, if you want to put label on it, opinions. every one them. you could look at powell versus mccormick, that was written by chief justice warren. it was a very careful you might agree or disagree, but it is a very careful examination of the original history and understanding of the relevant provisions of the constitution. or heller, second amendment case. just scalia and justice stevens both, majority and dissent, wrote opinions that are