Credit for 500,000. He basically doubles the amount he can borrow against his apartment. He later uses that money, he says, to pay Stormy Daniels in october 2016. And Rudy Giuliani has told us there are several other issues that he settled for trump and that he was reimbursed for. It is possible, though we dont know how he spent the remaining amount in his increased credit line that he may have used that for some of these other issues and thats one of the things thats under investigation. Thats such a Key Line Saying mr. Cohen resolved other problems similarly for mr. Trump. How significant is that . We have Rudy Giuliani giving a variety of figures about how much money was used here, when it was used. Walk us three visavis the size of those payments. Rudy giuliani said he was getting north of 400,000 for a year of Retainer Payments and
that was to reimburse him for things he took care of. It leaves open the possibility of up to another couple hundred thousand dollars that he might hav
they could also, they may also know why donald trump is lying, conspiring, doing all these things to keep these documents, when all he had to do to avoid this is turn over what belongs to the u.s. government months and months, years ago. we still don t understand why i don t ice of don t understand. this whole case could have been avoided. i m not entirely sure how trump got himself into this hot water. this is sometimes somebody who is looking for trouble. thanks to both of you. catherine christian, former assistant district attorney in manhattan, msnbc legal analyst. and former democratic congresswoman elizabeth holtzman of new york, the author of the case for impeaching trump. still ahead this hour on velshi, learning milestones when it comes to this deadly heat. phoenix, arizona, now endured 30 consecutive days of temperatures over 110 degrees. and it s getting worse. plus, far-right ideologies are filling the halls of congress. but these aren t just fringe
i did as well as former white house press secretary stephanie grisham. all right. you heard alyssa say it, and i want now to bring in the former trump white house press secretary stephanie grisham. stephanie, i know alyssa reached out to you. you knew that she said that. but obviously this is very important in the context of now you ve had the american court system, the american jury system has reached a conclusion of what the president, former president, his behavior and what he did. can you tell us more about what alyssa is talking about, about what happened in the white house? yeah. i do want to say, first, quickly that, you know, when this was all happening, i thought to myself today, if the jury comes back and they find him not guilty, that is our justice system, and i think we need to live with it. so i think that the opposite should apply to those who, you know, are saying it s just a civil trial or e. jean carroll is lying, et cetera. back to what alyssa said. yes, i wrot
seen lie after lie, sleaze after sleaze from successive conservative governments. i sleaze from successive conservative governments- - - governments. i don t think we can assume michael governments. i don t think we can assume michael gove governments. i don t think we can assume michael gove is governments. i don t think we can assume michael gove is lying, - governments. i don t think we can assume michael gove is lying, that| assume michael gove is lying, that is a very strong thing to have said. he said it on national television this morning, talking to laura kuenssberg on bbc one. if there was information going to come forward he would be very foolish to stick his neck out in that way, surely? itruihat would be very foolish to stick his neck out in that way, surely? what i am sa in: neck out in that way, surely? what i am saying is. neck out in that way, surely? what i am saying is. we neck out in that way, surely? what i am saying is, we need neck out in that way, su
lied to ian bremmer, maybe trying to show off about what was happening. the other possibility is ian bremmer is lying or got it wrong. i don t think that he has necessarily incentive to do that. and the fourth sort of, my good faith hypothesis, which i m hoping is the case, is that somehow all got misunderstood and conflated. which is maybe that elon musk says to ian, you know, i talked to putin, maybe doesn t say when he talked to putin and continues on, and continues talking about ukraine as if it was all happening now. ian misunderstands it, and reports it as if it had just happened. that seems i hope for two people that i imagine in both elon musk and ian bremmer, that if they re all acting in good faith, that s probably is what happened. or maybe musk is talking to putin but didn t want that to continue to be public. that was door number one. that was one. it s easy to get confused.