implement these laws. thank you so much for your particularlyrvice, for tip o neill. i grew up in the district. arms to s distributes the poor all over the world in 30 different countries in areas of severe conflict. back.ed to touch anseems to be a extreme lack of accountability among federal officers. we cannot get a name or a number. shelter, provide food, and we are trying to make ventures. we have a conversation and seem to get anybody at the table. it does an outstanding job in certain circumstances. it is heart wrenching in terms of funds consistent with our laws but that have the effect of providing relief at the same time, not just in syria. it comes up in memory many troubled parts of the world. i am happy to look into the .uestion we strive to a high level of clarity and communication. toetimes, the issues relate specific matters that are not public matters. i would have to look at the specific matter to respond. thank you. good morning. stern group. my
defendant, even though it now appears that faa fisa amendment acts were used in criminal prosecutions. there was a great story about this by charlie savage about the fact that the solicitor general, when he argued to the supreme court, represented to the court that fisa amendments act requires removal defendants to receive notice when the government is prosecuting them on the basis of evidence derived from the fisa amendments act. it turns out not to have been the justice department s policy. their policy was to deny defendants notice, even in circumstances in which they were entitled to it under the statute and constitution. they have changed that policy, which is a good. it seems there is a disconnect between the justice department and some of the security agencies about what has to be released and what can be done to ensure what you have said. that data needs to be revealed to the defense. i do not think there is a disconnect between the department of justice and the i
they are only working now because a glitch czar had to be appointed. i do not know how you feel about that stop it upsets me. you came before the committee and told us that everything was ok. we spent hundreds of millions of dollars. we had 3.5 years to get it right and then we had to appoint a glitch czar to get it right. the enrollment numbers are meager. perhaps you have a different story. ayres, canceled plans, broken promises. that is just the start. now we know that your agency failed to heed internal warnings about the lack of readiness of the exchanges. it is my hope today that he will come to the subcommittee, prepared to answer our questions. i hope you will set the talking points aside. you owe this to your superiors. you owe this to the secretary. you owe this to the president. you owe this to the congress. you owe it to the american people. this committee is about oversight. that requires that we look at the past. it requires that we look at the future. the probl
really? because the washington post report that is a third of people enrolled are not actually enrolled after all. that is only part of the problem plaguing the failed website. we have latest from the wall street journal and also cyber expert david kennedy. thanks to both of you for joining us. spencer, this is startling, a third of people. you ve been doing a ton of reporting on this. does this sound right to you a third of people sign up haven t signed up. the government disputes the figure. melissa: they say it doesn t accurately reflect the picture what is happening now. i m not sure that is really a dispute of third. that is like, not exactly what is happening today. maybe they re saying only 29%. we don t know the actual figures. there is no question there have been a lot of problems with the enrollment of the people who are trying to enroll. through healthcare.gov. programs with transmitting data. when you put data into the website it is not being properly tran
department of health and human services. mr. todd park is the chief technology officer of the united states. roekel is the chief information officer of the united states. rules, asuant to the many of you will see, i was asked that you rise to take a sworn oath. please raise your right hands. do you swear or from the testimony you are about to give away the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth? but the record reflect that all answers all answered in the affirmative. this is a large panel. it is going to be a long day. witnesses will be asked questions by both sides of the aisle. i would ask that since your opening statements are placed in the record verbatim that you adhere to the time clock and come to a halt as quickly as possible when it s red. yellow is not an opportunity to start a new subject. it is an opportunity to wrap up. with that, we will go to our distinguished guests, mr. pounder. we appreciate the opportunity .o testify in july, i testified before t