Health centers are, how many there are in the United States. Sure. Community Health Centers are the comprehensive care, primary care Centers Across the United States. So theres 1400 organizations. Each have multiple sites averaging 8 to 9. Theres about 12,000 Health Community centers around the nation. They have tstrategically placed in every territory. We offer comprehensive primary care including medical care, dental, or health. Disorders a and many other things we do. We are the connection to really the safety net. We have 49 medicaid patients. We have 23 uninsured. Were the ones on the front lines providing primary care to the communities that really need it. For those uninsured, what happens with those folks . How much are you paid back for the services . Its a great benefit. We have a great relationship with the bureau of primary health care. They administer the Public Health 330 grant. About 16 of each budget is made of that. That enables us to take care of the 23 that have no h
Please make sure to silence all cell phones on electronic devices. Replace speaker cards and any documents to be submitted to the clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good shape. It is an honor to be your cosponsor. Does mr. Sanchez, not
Clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good shape. It is an honor to be your cosponsor. Does mr. Sanchez, nothing from planning, is there any Public Comments on item number one . Seeing none. Public comment is closed. If there is no object
Okay, there is no fine for this. Do they have to run the title . Please make sure to silence all cell phones on electronic devices. Replace speaker cards and any documents to be submitted to the clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good
Going to happen here and its a terrible thing. Im not under im not trying to diminish the importance, but the worst Case Scenario would be after all these hearings are over and the c. U. Is approved but a variance is denied, that the permit holder sometime, probably in the beginning of 2021, because thats how long its going to take, is going to have to cutoff 5 feet of the house and go back to go back to what the original program was. The Planning Commission would have the ability to make other modifications to the project. They could reduce the height of it, they could reduce the extension. Im hesitant to give that information to the appellant because the commission can and has in other cases, you know, had them go back to what was there before. In this case, i think what at least weighs in their favor is what was there before was a legal noncomplying structure. It has a garage at the front i mean, generally planning principles would be to have something towards the front of the prope