not to mention the deeply rooted presumption against .xtraterritoriality the behavior of our law enforcement agents abroad sends a powerful message about the rule of law to individuals everywhere come and you are asking us to make that distinction that if a law andrcement agent shoots kills somebody who is on one , although therder , thect is identical officer is standing in the same place. what kind of message that will send. the rule of law can be in force and demonstrated in other ways. by discipline it doesn t happen. we know that. we cited this in our brief, the border patrol has changed its training, given detailed instruction on the use of deadly force, and this goes to the rule of law about investigations after if the border control agent stood where he stood and took the shot where he did in the only difference was that the teenager was an american citizen, is there there would think be, but that is a different question than whether an alien should have a
we will get started as folks continue to wander in from class. i am the director of the institute here at georgetown and on behalf of of the executive director and the assistant director, we are happy to welcome all of you here to what promises to be a very interesting discussion of the pending nomination to the u.s. supreme court. i will introduce the moderator, who is a supreme court correspondent, adam liptak. the new york times purveyor of genuine news. he will introduce other panelists. take it away. thank you all for being here. mr. liptak: thank you. so i see in the flyer that we promised you an engaging roundtable of experts. i m going to introduce the panelists and then talk a little bit about the formatting and get under way. so to my right is mr. dvoretzky, from jones day where he wanders the empty hallways. looking for his colleagues that have joined the trump administration. he s a graduate of law school and a former law clerk to justice scalia. and to his righ
he said that the bad bobby and good bobby, by the end there was the dominant personality. it s not accidental that barack obama and i think hillary clinton looked as role model more than any politician in american history to bobby kennedy being the one they we wanted to model and go after. as we end, i would like to just say one last thing, so bill green joked that i had written books on strange topics and including a guy named superman. i would like to present this shirt to bill green. it is i won t make you put it on tonight. [applause] but we give him a wonderful round of applause and if nothing else reading the book twice. thank you very much. [applause] you couldn t have known that that s what everybody called me as mayor. there will be a book signing. they ll be lining up in the west gallery. you were wonderful. [inaudible conversations] here is our prime time line-up, the life and career of appellate judge, and at 9:00 american enterprise institute charles
Why pull them back completely? well, because in the case of harriet myer in 2018, she had to come and testify and then you have to invoke executive privilege on a question by question basis. i don t think mulvaney or pompeo or bolton really are able to invoke executive privilege on a whole host of questions that i could think of. executive privilege involves a conversation involving a deliberative decision that you have with the president. there s so much additional evidence that do not involve those perhaps direct conversations that are very, very telling that they could not invoke executive privilege on. so i think the reason the white house doesn t want to do it is because they don t have good answers. they ve sort of all indicated there s so much evidence around each of those three that they were in other than bolton, that they were in on what bolton