set expectations for what could and would happen next because it does seem like something is happening. today our cameras caught three of donald trump s lawyers at the department of justice minutes after they left, donald trump started posting about the case saying, quote, how can doj possibly charge me, who did nothing wrong, when no other presidents were charged? so does donald trump know something we do not? joining us is senior legal correspondent laura jarrett and nbc news justice and intelligence correspondent ken dilanian. donald trump s lawyers were at doj, ken. do we know who they were meeting with? we know who they weren t meeting with. attorney general garland and deputy attorney general lisa mona core were not involved. presumably it was with career officials who have some oversight over this case and are briefed on this case. it s very common for defense attorneys to come in at the end of an investigation and make their case to management at the justice departm
we must all work together to address the hate that remains a stain on the soul of america. our hearts are heavy once again, but our resolve must never, ever waver. the uk government says it wouldn t be deterred from taking action over post brexit trading arrangements in northern ireland to try to help restore power sharing at stormont. and a triumphant ukraine wins the eurovision song contest after claiming the popular vote. good afternoon and welcome to bbc news. sweden and finland have confirmed they will apply for nato membership ending decades of military non alignment. the finnish president, sauli niinisto, called his country s decision historic. however, sweden s governing social democrats, said that as members they would not accept nuclear weapons or alliance bases on swedish territory. reports say both countries are planning to hand their membership applications to nato on wednesday. nato foreign ministers who are meeting in berlin say they want a rapid access
lead the next phase, whatever the judgment of the pm about him. you told the prime minister to sack mr hancock. i told the prime minister to sack mr hancock. ., ~ told the prime minister to sack mr hancock. ., ~ , ., hancock. i don t think i use that word with hancock. i don t think i use that word with him hancock. i don t think i use that word with him but hancock. i don t think i use that word with him but i hancock. i don t think i use that word with him but i did - hancock. i don t think i use that word with him but i did use - hancock. i don t think i use that word with him but i did use it. hancock. i don t think i use that word with him but i did use it in| hancock. i don t think i use that l word with him but i did use it in a whatsapp with simon case. you described it whatsapp with simon case. you described it thus, to save lives and protect the nhs. that described it thus, to save lives and protect the nhs. protect the nhs. that was gallows humour.
would have been in constant session, but you are right, it is a judgment about how you are putting things up, when you put them together, and obviously trying to make sure that the culture is of collaboration and high trust and so on, so that the boundary issues, boundaries are interfaces, not barriers. find boundary issues, boundaries are interfaces, not barriers. and when ou ve interfaces, not barriers. and when you ve divided. interfaces, not barriers. and when you ve divided, my interfaces, not barriers. and when you ve divided, my final interfaces, not barriers. and when you ve divided, my final question, | you ve divided, my final question, but it is my inquiry, i will change the rules! laughter erm. .. laughter erm. when you have different bodies doing different aspects how do you make sure that the final decision makers, obviously the most important, the key decisions, which is what module two is all about, that they do have all of the fact is there that they ca
of an investigation and make their case to management at the justice department that their client shouldn t be indicted. and it s just one more piece of evidence that this investigation appears to be reaching its end. one more piece of evidence. so we have that. we have donald trump tweeting right after it. can we take that to mean anything? donald trump talking about charging minutes after his lawyers walk snout. i mean, i think we ve seen in the past, we saw in the new york case, when the heat starts to turn up, trump often, you know, comes out with these all caps inflammatory tweets denouncing prosecutors and then prosecutors take action. so look, forget about trump for a second. his former lawyer was on meet the press yesterday and said that he believed that since the grand jury hadn t met since may, that jack smith, the special counsel, was reaching a charging decision in this case. now he thinks it s possible that there won t be charges, but that