Live Breaking News & Updates on Group Procedures|Page 3
Stay updated with breaking news from Group procedures. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Comment first year i think at any time highly problematic so have a mechanism whereby you appeal you have to use the Building Permit to that address the environmental officer. In that case you can delay the process every longer because you can wait until the actual permit t is issued. So if thats the last approval then i have a mechanism to rely on in that respect by appealing the Building Permit itself but to use the permit as an excuse to royal the decision by the environmental officer is problematic. And with respect to the integrity of the planning staff and city departments and everything. Id like to remind everyone that the city lost the case on the bicycling plan and the judge ruled it had to be back for an vial report and the city lost the Housing Element eir so its not also the case the city makes the correct ....
Im even sure its appropriate for me to be saying anything. A couple of of issues that are okay to say that doesnt concern directly the proposals before you but some things that have been said with the board of appeals i agree with the past comment first year i think at any time highly problematic so have a mechanism whereby you appeal you have to use the Building Permit to that address the environmental officer. In that case you can delay the process every longer because you can wait until the actual permit t is issued. So if thats the last approval then i have a mechanism to rely on in that respect by appealing the Building Permit itself but to use the permit as an excuse to Royal Decision by the environmental officer is problematic. And with respect to the integrity of the planning staff and city departments and ever ....
Methods of review you have those properties. And i think that it only takes a 2350i projects where you have a personal experience where something depose array where we here about the Ortega Branch library they received the sequa determination but the sequa determination deemed there were no changes to the project. And this kind of appeal process would have helped it was an unfortunate process and the Ortega Library was that demolished and the other library was small and it was extensively altered. So im no support thank you. Ive been inclined to adopt the staffs remedies here. What really has changed my mind is one of the argument made by staff is this is a substantial new process without any need. And i think they maybe correct in that. But theres another aspect to it which is that if, in fact, these there isnt a need for this particular process the only harm that can come of ....
Tim collins said i dont know if you read the newspaper in his other life hes a geologist and on another argument this was too costly and too time consuming and would eat up the resources of the planning staff. That argument was made previously and i think that this commission should not take into account if its something 3 needs to be done the Mayors Office will make it happen thank you any other member of the public wish to speak. Seeing none, well close and bring it back to commission. Ill leadoff. At first blush i was hesitating on adding the process, however, thinking about it and the length of time to get to the board of appeals and the amen of time between a project starting and finishing the board of appeals i mean, i think they would not be experts in the field to make sdergsz i think it might go sideways. Bringing it back to the eshthsz r o strengthens the case and would cause folks hesitation on going to the board of appe ....