Live Breaking News & Updates on Group Procedures|Page 4
Stay updated with breaking news from Group procedures. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
You read the newspaper in his other life hes a geologist and on another argument this was too costly and too time consuming and would eat up the resources of the planning staff. That argument was made previously and i think that this commission should not take into account if its something 3 needs to be done the Mayors Office will make it happen thank you any other member of the public wish to speak. Seeing none, well close and bring it back to commission. Ill leadoff. At first blush i was hesitating on adding the process, however, thinking about it and the length of time to get to the board of appeals and the amen of time between a project starting and finishing the board of appeals i mean, i think they would not be experts in the field to make sdergsz i think it might go sideways. Bringing it back to the eshthsz r o strengthens the case and would cause folks hesitation on going to the board of appeals if the e r o confirms their ....
Properties. And i think that it only takes a 2350i projects where you have a personal experience where something depose array where we here about the Ortega Branch library they received the sequa determination but the sequa determination deemed there were no changes to the project. And this kind of appeal process would have helped it was an unfortunate process and the Ortega Library was that demolished and the other library was small and it was extensively altered. So im no support thank you. Ive been inclined to adopt the staffs remedies here. What really has changed my mind is one of the argument made by staff is this is a substantial new process without any need. And i think they maybe correct in that. But theres another aspect to it which is that if, in fact, these there isnt a need for this particular process the only harm that can come of it will be at the hands of nasty ....
Staff is this is a substantial new process without any need. And i think they maybe correct in that. But theres another aspect to it which is that if, in fact, these there isnt a need for this particular process the only harm that can come of it will be at the hands of nasty people who wish to obstruct other perfectly proper and desirable projects. I dont think there will be many of them. The climate in San Francisco seems to have changed over the recent years and the people are not somewhat less than inclined to support obstruction of projects. When the obstruction is not based on something that is really to do with the project itself and is motivated by ill will or a political war which is going on outside of the commission. I have as many others who appeared have had some experience with an appeal before the board of permanent appeals. That Groupings Group has its own proc ....
Particular process the only harm that can come of it will be at the hands of nasty people who wish to obstruct other perfectly proper and desirable projects. I dont think there will be many of them. The climate in San Francisco seems to have changed over the recent years and the people are not somewhat less than inclined to support obstruction of projects. When the obstruction is not based on something that is really to do with the project itself and is motivated by ill will or a political war which is going on outside of the commission. I have as many others who appeared have had some experience with an appeal before the board of permanent appeals. That Groupings Group has its own procedures and ways to deal with things in some instances its satisfactory and other instances not. I was impressed with the fact that if theres this appeal that supervisors kim and chu favor this ....
Good afternoon commissioners im here we go representing the sierra club. Originally we were i fighting to have the clock start attorneyclient on the approval. And now theres legislation only if theres a way to appeal a modification. Weve been working with supervisor kim and chu for weeks now. This is not about the current e r o its about future e r os 10 to 15 years dune the line who may try to sneak a proposal in. The recreation and parks are going to install this was originally in january 2007 those plans to install soccer fields were categorically exempt from review. This was clearly a political decisions because neighborhood you fought back and theres synthetic soccer fields and the other neighborhoods fought back n and the rec and park backed down and they did an Environmental Review and the eir a big litigated. But they were no help in the soccer field struggle. Again, the sierra club wanted to have the clock tick we a ....