Page 5 - Group Patrons News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Group patrons. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Group Patrons Today - Breaking & Trending Today

SFGTV January 20, 2013

The building needs to be revised, not the permit to demolish. Do you want to separate votes . I think you can do one vote. Were upholding the site permit with the revised plan dates january 10. On that motion, from commissioner fung, president hwang . Aye. Thank you. Commissioner hurtado is absent. Vice president lazarus . Aye. And commissioner honda . Aye. Thank you. The vote is 40 and the demolition permit suprahold asis and the site performance is uphold with those revised plans. Thank you. Calling item no. 7, appeal no. 1214 1 gration wu versus the department of building inspection, subject property at 42 lapp hamm way. Appealing the imposition of a penalty on november 13th, 2012tor Construction Work Done would you tell us a permit. Good evening. This is my first time to remodel the house. I hired a contractor. And i followed his instructions and i didnt know he didnt get a permit. Right now i already got the
United States , San Francisco , Lapp Hamm , Bashir Shahin , Department Building , Construction Work Done , Tell Us , First Time , Building Permit , Plumbing Contractors , Complaint Department , Nine Times , Resources Department , Ground Floor , Public Comment , Property Owner , Tobacco Sales , State Law , San Francisco Health , San Francisco Health Code , Francisco Health , Francisco Health Code , Health Code , Health Department , Takes Time , Senior Health ,

SFGTV January 21, 2013

To reflect the changes. And i would ask just that plan set be noted by date. Submitted to the board, which is january 10, 2013. Okay. So moved. Im inclined to move in that direction to go in that direction as well based on the testimony of the Zoning Administrator that its code compliant. The motion has been made if you could call the roll mr. Pachecko. Exwere upholding both permits the demolition and the site. Motion from commissioner fung to uphold both permits and the condition is that they that the permits be revised with the revised plans dated with our stamp, january 10 2013. Just the permit to erect the building needs to be revised, not the permit to demolish. Do you want to separate votes . I think you can do one vote. Were upholding the site permit with the revised plan dates january 10. On that motion, from commissioner fung, president hwang . Aye. Thank you. Commissioner hurtado is absent. Vice president lazarus . ....

United States , San Francisco , Lapp Hamm , Bashir Shahin , Allison Rowe , Jim Patrick , Zoning Administrator , Department Building , Construction Work Done , Tell Us , First Time , Building Permit , Plumbing Contractors , Complaint Department , Nine Times , Resources Department , Ground Floor , Public Comment , Property Owner , Tobacco Sales , State Law , San Francisco Health , San Francisco Health Code , Francisco Health , Francisco Health Code , Health Code ,

SFGTV January 24, 2013

And it was remodel of kitchen and bathroom without permits, obtaining permits called for start work inspection on october 31. The applicant then came in on the 13th of november, got an overthecounter permit to comply with the notice. I believe the penalty and notice of was nine times on value of is 15,000, so it is in our code to put the nine times penalty on. Sometimes we do get them up here with paying the penalties. I would not be against a reduction, of some type. People always make the excuse that they didnt know that they needed a permit. There is a lot of resources in the department to find out if you need a permit or not. There is the website and other ways to find out. You also need a building permit, electrical permit and plumbing permit for this type of work. So im available for questions, but the penalty was properly imposed unfortunately. Mr. Duffy, are all of your complaints anonymous . No, not all. They are harder to investigate because we dont know where they are coming ....

United States , San Francisco , Bashir Shahin , Allison Rowe , Jim Patrick , Nine Times , Resources Department , Ground Floor , Public Comment , Property Owner , Tobacco Sales , State Law , San Francisco Health , San Francisco Health Code , Francisco Health , Francisco Health Code , Health Code , Health Department , Takes Time , Senior Health , Senior Health Inspector , Health Inspector , Young Work , Work Department , Environmental Health , Tobacco Products ,

SFGTV January 27, 2013

Commissioner i reviewed the drawings and they reflect what i remember of the proposed changes at that point in time and im prepared to move to uphold the permit and condition it on the documentation that has been provided to reflect the changes. Is that the appropriate it sounds like what you want to do is grant the appeal and uphold the permit on the condition that it is revised, to reflect the changes. And i would ask just that plan set be noted by date. Submitted to the board, which is january 10, 2013. Okay. So moved. Im inclined to move in that direction to go in that direction as well based on the testimony of the Zoning Administrator that its code compliant. The motion has been made if you could call the roll mr. Pachecko. Exwere upholding both permits the demolition and the site. Motion from commissioner fung to uphold both permits and the condition is that they that the permits be revised with the revised plans date ....

United States , San Francisco , Lapp Hamm , Bashir Shahin , Allison Rowe , Scott Sanchez , Zoning Administrator , Department Building , Construction Work Done , Tell Us , First Time , Building Permit , Plumbing Contractors , Complaint Department , Nine Times , Resources Department , Ground Floor , Public Comment , Property Owner , Tobacco Sales , State Law , San Francisco Health , San Francisco Health Code , Francisco Health , Francisco Health Code , Health Code ,

SFGTV February 2, 2013

Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is submitted. Commissioner i reviewed the drawings and they reflect what i remember of the proposed changes at that point in time and im prepared to move to uphold the permit and condition it on the documentation that has been provided to reflect the changes. Is that the appropriate it sounds like what you want to do is grant the appeal and uphold the permit on the condition that it is revised, to reflect the changes. And i would ask just that plan set be noted by date. Submitted to the board, which is january 10, 2013. Okay. So moved. Im inclined to move in that direction to go in that direction as well based on the testimony of the Zoning Administrator that its code compliant. The motion has been made if you could call the roll mr. Pachecko. Exwere upholding both permits the demolition and the site. Motion from commissioner fung to uphold both permits and the condition is that they th ....

United States , San Francisco , Lapp Hamm , Bashir Shahin , Allison Rowe , Scott Sanchez , Zoning Administrator , Department Building , Construction Work Done , Tell Us , First Time , Building Permit , Plumbing Contractors , Complaint Department , Nine Times , Resources Department , Ground Floor , Public Comment , Property Owner , Tobacco Sales , State Law , San Francisco Health , San Francisco Health Code , Francisco Health , Francisco Health Code , Health Code ,