Stay updated with breaking news from Gray panel. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Work that is proposed currently and additionally, and a letter from mr. Morton was received yesterday after the publication of the report further out lying the concerns regarding the proposed work and a copy is available for the public and also been forwarded to the commission. And specifically the letter raises the concern that as proposed, when you try the extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional h ....
Montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional historic fabric from the building. This will replace the historic fabric that was previously removed with the compatible replacement material to bring back the building and still convey the building as a resource. As such the department has found that the proposed work meets the standards and the requirement of article ten and therefore, it is exempt from the secua. The project sponsor is here to scribe the project for me and the details of the skop of work. That includes the administration and if the staff is available for any questions that you have. Thank you. We ....
Extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional historic fabric from the building. This will replace the historic fabric that was previously removed with the compatible replacement material to bring back the building and still convey the building as a resource. As such the department has found that the proposed work meets the standards and the requirement of article ten and therefore, it is exempt from the ....
Work that is proposed currently and additionally, and a letter from mr. Morton was received yesterday after the publication of the report further out lying the concerns regarding the proposed work and a copy is available for the public and also been forwarded to the commission. And specifically the letter raises the concern that as proposed, when you try the extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional h ....
From seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional historic fabric from the building. This will replace the historic fabric that was previously removed with the compatible replacement material to bring back the building and still convey the building as a resource. As such the department has found that the proposed work meets the standards and the requirement of article ten and therefore, it is exempt from the secua. The project sponsor is here to scribe the project for me and the details of the skop ....