Spotted even if she was inside her own courthouse grabbing coffee in the cafeteria. Thats where we are today, and look, we have to extend the threat concern to of Course Witnesses who are already being targeted by trump and his cohorts, the prosecutors, of course, and the jury, of course, the many jurors, all of this in a high threat environment. Complained about her . More like railed against her. And a reminder, she was confirmed to the bench unanimously. Meanwhile, the Special Counsels office has proposed january 2nd, 2024, as a trial date in the case, though some experts think that might be a little optimistic. This is the Special Counsel right Out Of The Box saying we are ready on january 2nd, so now when the defense comes back with, well be ready on january 2nd 2025, the judge is going to balance the scale. And then come up with a more reasonable time period. Trumps team has one week to respond, then judge chutkan will set an official trial date before the end of this month. Down
Underway in a matter of hours and while donald trump himself is not expected to attend, his behavior will be at the center of things, because judge Tanya Chutkan will hear arguments about are opposed protective order that would limit what trump can do with the evidence. The judge will consider those arguments while she is surrounded physically by u. S. Marshals. That new Security Detail was retained after the former president complained about her on his social media site. A sad State Of Affairs to see the judge have to be a full time Security Detail. Nbc news reported this was spotted even if she was inside her own courthouse grabbing coffee in the cafeteria. Thats where we are today, and look, we have to extend the threat concern to of Course Witnesses who are already being targeted by trump and his cohorts in the prosecutors, of course, and the jury, of course, the many jurors, all of this in a high threat environment. Complained about her, more like railed against her and a reminder
at issue, needs to make sure that is stringent enough to deal with that circumstance. peter, trump is trying his case in the court of public opinion with the hopes of never having to try it in an actual court, so the fact that d.c. has strict rules about how defendants and their lawyers have to act, trump s just going to blow his nose with that. he s gonna throw it out the window. absolutely. he has every time before. he basically dares the sy to come do something about it. he did this throughout the mueller case. he did this throughout every other prosecution we have had up until now. he has an ad on the air attacking the fulton county prosecutor who may indict him for the first time this week. imagine that. a defendant literally airing an ad attacking the prosecutor who s about to indict him. i don t know whether it s wise or not, but certainly not unheard of it s pretty unusual, i would say. but he hasn t played by the rules that other people do. he placed by his own rules. he d
when you have one side trying the case in the court of public opinion and the other side that is playing by the rules. so for all of those reasons, protective orders are very routine. they are ordered in most criminal cases and one that in particular is taking into account the public statements of donald trump and his propensity to intimidate witnesses and have their safety at issue, needs to make sure that is stringent enough to deal with that circumstance. peter, trump is trying his case in the court of public opinion with the hopes of never having to try it in an actual court, so the fact that d. c. has strict rules about how defendants and their lawyers have to act, trump s just going to blow his nose with that. he s gonna throw it out the window. absolutely. he has every time before. he basically dares the system to come do something about it. he did this throughout the mueller case. he did this throughout every other prosecution we have had up until now. he has an ad on the a