Maybe as university commencement, you get the idea. And then there are speeches from our most recent former president. Before i show you his speech today, i have to warn you it is vulgar. But we are going to play it uncensored, for reasons that i will outline after we play this sound. So prepare yourself. Im sorry, i wont be able to go to iowa today, i wont be able to go to the New Hampshire today, because im sitting in a court room today on bullshit because the Attorney General charge mean something. Terrible. [applause] bullshit bullshit that was a former president United States, president donald trump, in New Hampshire today, calling the multiple criminal indictments against him very serious charges, that was trump characterizing those indictments as bs. Im not bringing this up because trump was unhinged in New Hampshire today, but because how unhinged dont trumps may actually substantively matter for these court cases you might remember that last friday, after trump posted on his s
Seen time and time again. And, they will not leave it alone. They wont let it go. And it would be, perhaps more evident, if the congressional delegation from ohio wasnt so outrageously gerrymandered. Yes. Anyway, its a good day for people who like democracy, and Representative Democracy at that. Thank you my friend. And thank you for joining us from home, for this hour of television. Imagine, for one second, what a speech from a former president normally looks like. Maybe its the opening of a president ial library, maybe its a university commencement, you get the idea. And then, there are speeches from our most recent former president. Before i show you his speech today, i have to warn you, it is vulgar. But we are going to play it, uncensored for reasons that i wont will outline after i play you the sound. So, prepare yourself. Im sorry, i will be able to go to iowa today, i will be able to go to New Hampshire today, because im sitting in a courtroom on [bleep], because, his Attorney
Indictment, as an unindicted coconspirator. but, without a doubt, he was very close, and had detailed knowledge of the activities of rudy giuliani, who of course is one of those unnamed, unindicted coconspirators, with the indictment. andrew, there were a lot of flies on the wall, in and around the campaign in the white house. and the flies are coming in, i m just the metaphor is gonna exhaust itself shortly. but, i do want to, before we end the segment. i do want to ask about this protective or, because this very much remains unresolved. joe judge chutkan has said, the trump team didn t come in until next friday. she sort of laid down the law. she is the judge. she is the judge. but, i do wonder, the behavior of trump on the campaign trail today does not show a man who seems to take a little concerned with the content of anything he is saying. he is as aggressive as he ever has been. what are the potential outcomes here? so, one thing i think is really important for people t
Say damning evidence the prosecution. but it sort of sounds like he might. that s right, i am not aware of any indicators that bernie kerik s testimony was the sort of discussion that would have gotten rudy giuliani in trouble. but he is a port of course, we could he just knows so much. when it comes to the question of filling in factual gaps, having somebody who was in the room for conversations, having someone who can explain all of the minor characters who played important but perhaps underestimated roles in the machinations that rudy giuliani and sidney powell were involved in, kerik himself provides that valuable insight. he is not indicated, in trump s indictment, as an unindicted coconspirator. but, without a doubt, he was very close, and had detailed knowledge of the activities of rudy giuliani, who of course is one of those unnamed, unindicted coconspirators, in the indictment. andrew, there were a lot of flies on the wall, in and around the campaign in the white house. an