this is a small alley, in essence, with a dead end. there is probably a number of concerns related to phase two. however, that is not before us. what is before us is based on essentially a single-family home. does it conform to the current bernal heights special use district codes? it does not. however, i could find it a modest non-conformance. the fact that the objectionable part is in the rear, in terms of what may have been a handy man or owner-initiated construction. that it has been removed, i find a acceptable, and that leads to my decision to support the legalization of this addition as a legal non- conforming use. my suggestion to the owners is i think they may have a more difficult time going through phase 2. vice president goh: this is a hard one. this is a hard one. i hear commissioner fung. i hear your comments, yet i do think we have evidence in front of us indicating that the better part of the illegal addition was done in the 90s, and we heard from the n ....