Former president donald trump. House democrats sent a letter to judicial conference in effort to rewrite federal standard. Democrats claim televising the trial will be beneficial. The letter was spearheaded by California Senate hopeful adam schiff, who wrote, given historic nature of the charges brought forth in cases, it is hard to imagine more powerful circumstance for televised proceedings. It will be vitally important for the public to witness how the trials are conducted. The credibility of witnesses. Critics slammed the move as a partisan slump, trumps officials invite the idea. I would love to see that, im convinced Biden Administration doesnt want people to see the truth. They want to keep Important Information about this case from the press. Emily Wall Street Journal argues cameras should stay far away from the courtroom, cameras can be distraction from seeking fair justice, particular risk in trump trial that will be a Global Media Circus in any case, that is precisely what d
And steve just mentioned georgia pending indictment there. so the number of charges could go up and there could be cameras in the courtroom and could be getting a mug shot in georgia, just that one picture alone. it is notable whenever trump s team and adam schiff agree on everything, this is like the one thing. trump is saying, i want the cameras because so far all of this, being out in the open and indictments have worked politically, keep the ball rolling. i think there are some republicans who may have shopped around for another candidate in the primary who see the doj so politically motivated they are saying best way to fight back is to vote for the guy they are going against and going after. that is the primary. how does this play in the general election with independents who might be more interested in the issue than the indictment and that has yet to be determined.
Do you think that the business owners that are responding to this are part of the key to this problem? absolutely. the health of the economy is what politicians are supposed to protect. not this phony thing called religious freedom. their freedom is that argument is just a veil over a personal prejudice. and you cannot write personal prejudice into civil law and cannotry your religious values into civil law. so these legislators don t know the constitution. they apparently don t listen either because in the legislature, they were told that this is going to do serious damage and stain the reputation of a beautiful state. one of the pieces of news today is that there s actually copycat legislation in georgia pending. what s your reaction to the idea that maybe this is a ripple effect? there have been others that