While you weren’t looking, the editor of your favorite secular humanist magazine (let’s assume) has been serving as the MW (like an MC, but it’s a Master of Webinars) for some of the recent Skeptical Inquirer Presents live online events. My role is a simple one, of course. The stars are the wick .
there are so many kinds of offensive. not only to the constitution itself but the human dignity. shannon: what she said was that she thought that this idea that previability, that an unborn fetus could feel pain is a fringe science. she said a group of french doctors who are in a vast minority and she says it is not actually founded in science. how do you respond? the argument is itself french and not worth a penny. not worth the paper that it could be printed upon. it is utterly repugnant to human dignity. completely outside the constitution. if the court is really worried about its own reputation, but it s dignity, about its consistency, about maintaining its role, it should get out of the business of lawmaking. shannon: also a conversation that women have relied on this, have relied on rote for 50 years. justin kagan talked about the fact that women have advanced in society and all these other things because they have relied