asw, as a result, judge doty issued unhinge ad sanctioneral against all federal government employees from having contac tntact with social media companies and discouraging or removingwi free speech. that means the cdc, the fbi, the doeansj, the white house. the judge specifically. namechecked. white house spokeswoman. karine jean-pierre. hhs secretary xavier becerracrer and surgeon general vivek murthy. noy n generalw on your screen if prohibited activities for the feds, which include meeting, emailing, flagging, callin meetingg, collaborating, threatening, urging, following up or issuing bolo g,s. be on the lookout for censoredt content with social media. it is an absolutelye ce stunning rebuke of the censorship deep state and the biden administrationnsp and it s a win for free speech. r, the bidenou administration has appealed this judge s injunction. k now, judges don t usually talk like this. they don t issue such scathinghi opinions or broad injunctions. why here? well,
my show s over strip tease thing off america. this is the hannity strip tease. okay, we already have enough. it s not that hannity is so sean, i would pay for you to do a live rap throw to me one night and i ll try to hang on . just wait for me.n: han i ll be right there. i ng on . one one radio. i m walking into the nextthe ne studioxt. how close are you to your make sure that make sure the make sure the lighting is really, you know, shadowy. and laur a. all right, hannity, i m gladu ha you have your tie on .ve a i thought you were going to wear like one of those. isally? now, is this going to be a strip tease? every this is a dangerous time. yes.p why stop there? like this? i can t go on. take the hour. all right. i can t do it. and it s extended hour of hannity to the taking it back . nice try, but apparently we lost our signal, which is fine with me because i m a talk show host and i never shut up. i ami african-american. i m black. well, you can say thank you for being
and threatening to take it away if the social media companies didn tal censor true informatio, including about vaccine side effects. it was truinclccine sidee and ae information that s in the public interest. a lot more to be said abou the t it,y but it s a huge victory for now. and we should definitely say, you know, mightfo going to ask you this, this is a victory when it comes to government influence on freee speech, but beyond simplye. government coercion, the united states has a unique cultural embrace of freedom of speech and one of the things that i m concerned about is either because of the government bifluenc eithee or because big h just does so on their ownt do account. e of we now have a culture of censorship beyond government influenc governmee. and so what i m concerned about is, regardless of the government s influence, big tech will continue to censor. you ve been inside of these companies now reporting, as we said, extensively. do we you think big tech, evene without
you, too. all right. the head of the senate judiciary and yale educatedheado lawyer dick durbin dropped thisd gem on twitter this week. free speech does not include spreading misinformation to downplay political violence. well, for starters, assertion is contrary to his oath ofhi office. but beyond that, he has to know what s wrong. so the question becomes, whywh is the head, the judiciary committee, purposefully whdefining what free speech, in fact, does mean?at is what s the end goathl here?d here now is independent journalist glenn greenwald. glenn, they forget that it s not just speech you agree with that s protected by the first amendment speech that s inconvenient that you even find vilereenwald is also protected, especially when you re talking about political speech.wh what ats happening here? i? i yeah, i mean, if free speech only is for people with whomgree you agree or think is telling the truth, you would need freee speech. norman, noam chomsky has always said one of the
who believes the rule of law, a man who doesn t believe as the left believes that if their ideology is at stake and their political presidency is at stake, that we should therefore suppress the truth and therefore we cannot allowe anyone to speak. what might impact a presidential election. this is a guy who the left is right. s it will have a globe and life altering consequences. it will have a dangerous precedent in their mind because they don t believe in the freee speech that each one of us has been raised to understand. free speech is in abouthe the people who are triggered ore who need a place to cry. free speech is the ability to say what you wanto to other people as longng as it is not criminal period. i hope to revise it and i hope i he does what whatt we weredo what we were just talking about and that is that we should know