Published in the new yorker, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the nation among other outlets. In his cover essay on the invisible bridge for the New York Times book review this past sunday frank rich wrote, it says much about perlsteins gift as a historian that he persuasively portrays a silky splendor interlude between the fall of nixon and the rise of reagan as his subtitle has it. Not just as a true bottom of our history but also as a Rosetta Stone for reading america and its politics today. It says much about his talent as a writer that he makes years of lively engrossing and on occasion partly funny. Perlstein knows how to sit through a culture for the telling forgotten detail. True to form, perlstein doesnt condescend to this conservative icon and seems to understand him. For now perlstein has taken the story only through the summer of our bicentennial year but much of what has happened in the nearly four decades since and perhaps much that is yet to come can be found
The posting done for the revised permit . We have the notification by our Central Permit Bureau staff that was required on 1 16 13 and we received the affidavit that it was done on june 2013. On the permit . One last question. This permit now appears to have a lot of retaining wall as part of it which then involves a shoring of the structure above and everything else. You dont consider that to be a significant alteration . No, the criteria the engineers have used is evaluating the load bearing Building Elements with the method that they would use and again, its going to be a case by case basis in terms of the analysis and the plans. We have an engineer sitting across from the engineer and they are going to discuss what is going to be required to meet the code requirements. Okay. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Okay. Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is yours. I dont know, you know, we have so many lawyers here. I dont know whether this is just a clear administrative rec
Lot of retaining wall as part of it which then involves a shoring of the structure above and everything else. You dont consider that to be a significant alteration . No, the criteria the engineers have used is evaluating the load bearing Building Elements with the method that they would use and again, its going to be a case by case basis in terms of the analysis and the plans. We have an engineer sitting across from the engineer and they are going to discuss what is going to be required to meet the code requirements. Okay. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Okay. Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is yours. I dont know, you know, we have so many lawyers here. I dont know whether this is just a clear administrative record before they proceed onward or not. There are a number of things that i probably not going to get into what this board can and cannot do with respect to construction process. However, in my opinion the amount of work that is represented by the permit is sign
Permit now appears to have a lot of retaining wall as part of it which then involves a shoring of the structure above and everything else. You dont consider that to be a significant alteration . No, the criteria the engineers have used is evaluating the load bearing Building Elements with the method that they would use and again, its going to be a case by case basis in terms of the analysis and the plans. We have an engineer sitting across from the engineer and they are going to discuss what is going to be required to meet the code requirements. Okay. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Okay. Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is yours. I dont know, you know, we have so many lawyers here. I dont know whether this is just a clear administrative record before they proceed onward or not. There are a number of things that i probably not going to get into what this board can and cannot do with respect to construction process. However, in my opinion the amount of work that is repr
Our Central Permit Bureau staff that was required on 1 16 13 and we received the affidavit that it was done on june 2013. On the permit . One last question. This permit now appears to have a lot of retaining wall as part of it which then involves a shoring of the structure above and everything else. You dont consider that to be a significant alteration . No, the criteria the engineers have used is evaluating the load bearing Building Elements with the method that they would use and again, its going to be a case by case basis in terms of the analysis and the plans. We have an engineer sitting across from the engineer and they are going to discuss what is going to be required to meet the code requirements. Okay. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Okay. Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is yours. I dont know, you know, we have so many lawyers here. I dont know whether this is just a clear administrative record before they proceed onward or not. There are a number of things th