mistake, whatever, correct it. we have since removed it and apologize for the mistake. let s see if that happens from this fox news person. let s see. or as we call it, fox propaganda on this show. thank you very much. thank you. appreciate it. california s recall election still four days away, but over on the fox propaganda network, they re already pushing the big lie, part two. a bogus claim that the only way democrats can win is if they somehow cheat. hey, i just got a text from my sister. you remember rick, her neighbor? sure, he s the 76-year-old guy who still runs marathons, right? sadly, not anymore. wow. so sudden. um, we re not about to have
narrative that it s everybody. there are outliers. you can build upon that. do ever think that a maga rally is going to be a fun place for jim acosta? no. but i think those moments are good. i think it s good for him to highlight it, as well. to keep up with the kind of bluster and reputation for how difficult it is for him there. he could have not mentioned it. also, giving the finger and some of the obscenities that are screamed are very different. i would rather get the finger then have that woman scream. that seems polite. melissa: as a recognizable fox news person who walks around new york city, you can sometimes have people be relatively hostile. i think it s i don t love what they are doing to him there. it looks very difficult. jessica: charlie says democracy is noisy. dagen: i have said for years, being in the journalism business, reporters of the worst
met at a party in his private life. this happened sat fox news between a fox news person and bill o reilly. why wouldn t you inquiry about that. howie: mounting questions about who knew what when, do you think this will be a big story regardless because of the sharp media focus with these allegations. the first and officer most of thing is bill o reilly is trying to get into the cable news world, or news broadcasting world. the claims coming forward is a product of that. also the culture has completely changed. after bill cosby, after roger ailes and all these allegations have been made against very powerful people, the harvey weinstein thing comes in. this morning a director james
met at a party in his private life. this happened sat fox news between a fox news person and bill o reilly. why wouldn t you inquiry about that. howie: mounting questions about who knew what when, do you think this will be a big story regardless because of the sharp media focus with these allegations. the first and officer most of thing is bill o reilly is trying to get into the cable news world, or news broadcasting world. the claims coming forward is a product of that. also the culture has completely changed. after bill cosby, after roger ailes and all these allegations have been made against very powerful people, the harvey weinstein thing comes in. this morning a director james
case file. when you look at that with the totality of everything i found in this case it s very consistent for a person with my experience to begin to think well perhaps there were some e-mail communications between seth and wikileaks. if you were so concerned at the time, why did you go on fox news and make that claim? i think that claim was true. think about it. if this fbi investigator that was developed by the fox news person. if that person what they are saying is true coupled with everything i had been finding in my investigation then any investigator would say to themselves maybe his death was a result of something related to his job. i want to be clear. you re saying at that moment you were telling the truth because you were lying on misinformation. exactly. when did you change your mind? i never changed my mind. i never backtracked anything. i actually never made those statements, those quotes in the first place. the day after that story was released is immediately