Page 7 - Fox Isn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Fox isn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Fox Isn T Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Murdoch before steak? the stand . cnn senior media reporter oliver darcy joins us now, what did the judge say? bad news for the murdochs? the judge says he s basically going to be able to force the murdochs both rupert and lachlan to testify at a trial in is the son who now runs the corporate laughlin is the ceo rupert murdoch is the chairman. and the this isn t really surprising. the judge had really indicated that he was going to go this direction, but it s something fox tried shielding the murdochs from and they tried, saying it would be inconvenient for the 92 year old murdoch, the elder murdoch to travel to wilmington s delaware . the judge didn t buy that excuse. he basically said, look, you got engaged recently. he s no longer engaged, but time he was, and he said that you re looking forward to traveling between your different residences across the world, so he wasn t really buying it. and today he basically said, look, if dominion wants them to testify, which they do, he s not ....
Can make a ruling on the law, so it s an unusual situation. so in defamation cases, truth can be an absolute defense. fox isn t even really trying that, though, shan, they re just going with first amendment. what s the difference here? well i think we should be thankful they re not trying that because we d be relitigating the entire election at this point, john, so the difference is fox s arguing that legally speaking, let s pretend for a moment judge that you think there are no facts in dispute here. but legally speaking, the first amendment completely insulates us from being sued for defamation here, their argument being look, these allegations were reporting on don t mean that we believe them or that we were pushing them. we were just being news gatherers, and they were newsworthy. so they re trying to basically use the first amendment as a complete legal defense to defamation case. which which really harkens back to a phrase that one of their hosts excuse ....
Supporting ukraine in this battle against putin he doesn t want to do that fight with trump or with others inside the party. we ve read it s incumbent upon lawmakers to explain to republican voters why this is so necessary. are you seeing them really attempt that right now are you seeing them doing an adequate job of trying to tell voters on fox news or fox isn t going to cover that it s not in their wheelhouse to cover that because it s anti-narrative for them. i don t expect fox to do a one-on-one on ukraine for their audience but, you re right, i think they have to step up the game in creating this narrative because there is possibly, i suspect, at least from the folks i talk to ....
All green, last i checked, fox isn t losing viewers. right, they re not losing. viewers and the question will, be what will they do to try to stem whatever hemorrhaging is going on right now? do you think this is actually going to go to trial? personally, i don t. i think that they re gonna have to settle. they re gonna have to put some sort of a lid on this pr nightmare. ndas and the life. but it s already out. they re all we have to do is replay the tax and replay what they said in trouble they said amongst themselves. time, and time again. our problem at msnbc, we have better stuff to do. that s the problem. we have better stories to share with people left there. that s like them choosing to re-litigate january six. no reason to litigate it and push conspiracy theories forward. everyone knows the truth. i want to talk about a new topic. it aligns with what we re already covering. i just want everyone to listen to this. it s a sample of what we recently heard from conservatives a ....
Tucker carlson himself said about trump. you mentioned, it by want to laid out again. but in january of 2020, one who s fed up with trump saying, we are very close to being able to ignore trump most nights, i truly cannot wait, he then said, i hate him passionately. this if this is how tucker carlson felt about donald trump, why and god s name has he been carrying his water, pushing the big lie, for months and months and months? why didn t he just say, trump, loss he failed us, it s got on the dissent to strain. two things, relevance and writing. they had, both as long as they stay loyal to trump, and criticizes him gently enough that he doesn t this so enraged the trump base, the trump base may not ever really know what s in these texts, where they may not ever know the talk of carlson had spoke so disparagingly and despair about trump, because fox isn t ....