the president of the united states who wants to know who it is and implying punishment? they may want to look at an alternative location. we have and when i was chairman committee, we did bring some high pr high-profile people. we were able to get them into the public, there are ways to do that. but, given the certainly the focus on who, what and when and where, i may argue. they may look at an alternative location and i would limit the staff severely who has exposure to this in the testimony. i think that would be an important thing for the whistleblower. if you do it in another classified setting, people who have clearances and who are there. there could be much gossip of the intelligence committee as anywhere else in the world. you don t want that kind of thing happening in this wild speculation of who it may be. you need to take extra precautions i think if you want
i ve been critical of hillary clinton, especially about the server but more of donald trump who is a sociopath and has conducted a campaign of demagoguery and fascism the likes of which we have never seen in our history and i think that s where hillary clinton needs to go. focus on who donald trump is, what he represents, the absolute horror of his semi-criminal business practices. one thing though, if she showed a bit more contrition about how she is responsible for this e-mail morass, and also she can t say this aloud but we have to remember that bill clinton getting on the plane with the attorney general of the united states put a new ceiling on the difficulties here for the director of the fbi that has made everything infinitely more difficult. so the behavior of the clintons has compounded this, but she needs to focus on who is donald
come to that conclusion. so focus on the culture of the community? yeah. zimmerman case i followed very closely. that was a self-defense defense you could have in florida, new york, alabama. i think if there s a difference, the difference is how a florida jury that has very different views about guns and how to defend yourself with a gun would come out differently than a new york jury. because in new york, you have a duty to retreat. right. those words where in the self defense statute. makes it easier theretofore give bad behavior. you give that same charge to a new york jury get a different outcome. what do you think about this where there s a lot of focus on
michael maloney days away from requiring when he was killed by a suspect later found dead inside the home of a woman. with the presidential campaign turning toward the general election, there s new focus on who mitt romney might choose as his running mate. the latest rasmussen numbers from rasmussen reports finds chris christie as the most favorable pick, rick santorum second and marco rubio third. scott rasmussen is the author of the people s money. what do you make of the veepstakes here? well, the first thing is when you look at these numbers, with the exception of rick santorum, people don t know who these guys are. high not sures and even opinions of them are soft. this tells me the candidate who
united states, they will get it striked at them. they are not immortal. this is going to happen. yes, it is a tactical pm operation because he was important not only within al-qaida. he was crucial for the al-qaida networks inside the united states so one thinks if we take out al-awlaki in iraq but another thing if we take out anwar al-awlaki who was a direct threat to national security meaning he had connections with elements within our own society, some of whom we have stopped. others, we weren t able to stop including the fort hood massacre issue. from that perspective, it s very important. at the same time, i keep cautioning, al-awlaki is not the end of the day. he is, you know, one part of that chain and now we re going to focus on who al-awlaki has changed. who al-awlaki has indoctrinated