the president of the united states who wants to know who it is and implying punishment? >> they may want to look at an alternative location. we have and when i was chairman committee, we did bring some high pr high-profile people. we were able to get them into the public, there are ways to do that. but, given the certainly the focus on who, what and when and where, i may argue. they may look at an alternative location and i would limit the staff severely who has exposure to this in the testimony. i think that would be an important thing for the whistleblower. if you do it in another classified setting, people who have clearances and who are there. there could be much gossip of the intelligence committee as anywhere else in the world. you don't want that kind of thing happening in this wild speculation of who it may be. you need to take extra precautions i think if you want