Discrimination. Last october, the court heard oral arguments for two consolidated cases concerning employment and Sexual Orientation. This is an hour. We will hear in case 171618, bostic versus Clayton County in a consolidated case. Take you thank you. When an employer fires a male men, he for dating violates title vii. The employer has discriminated against the man because he treats that man worse than women who want to do the same thing. That discrimination is because of sex. Because the adverse employment malesis based on the employee to confirm about how men should behave that men should be attracted only to women and not to men. There is no analytic difference between this kind of discrimination and forms of discrimination that have been already recognized by every court to have addressed them. For example, discrimination against men who are effeminate rather than macho. That discrimination is because of nonconformity with an expectation of how men should behave. The attempt to ca
Versus clayton county. Thank you, mr. Chief justice. When an employer filed a male employee for dating men but does not fire female employees that dates men discriminated against the man because he treats that and worse than women that want to do the same thing. That discrimination is because of sex. Because the adverse employment action is based on the male toloyees failure to conform a particular expectation about how men should behave. That men should be attracted only to women. There is no difference between this kind of discrimination and forms of discrimination that of an already recognized by every court to have addressed them. Her example, discrimination against men who are a feminine. Is becausemination of nonconformity with an expectation about how men should behave. Carve outt to discrimination against men for being gay from title vii cannot be administered with consistency or integrity. Resort tojudges to been counting where they count epithets tos of determine whether or n
Who want to do the same thing. That discrimination is because of sex. Because the adverse employment malesis based on the employee to confirm about how men should behave that men should be attracted only to women and not to men. There is no analytic difference between this kind of discrimination and forms of discrimination that have been already recognized by every court to have addressed them. For example, discrimination against men who are effeminate rather than macho. That discrimination is because of nonconformity with an expectation of how men should behave. The attempt to carve out discrimination against men for being gay, from title vii, cannot be administered with either consistency or integrity. Resort tojudges to lexical deed county where epithets to determine whether or not discrimination is based on sex or Sexual Orientation. That attempt is futile because when a man is discriminated against for being gay, he is discriminated against for not conforming to an expectation abo
Deputy. Thanks for joining us at 10, im ken wayne, im pam moore, the attack over the weekend killed 38 yearold Sergeant Damon got swell or who leaves behind a pregnant wife in a 2 yearold child. Cuts will or was a 14 year veteran of the Santa Cruz County sheriffs office. As you just heard the county sheriff is calling his death a murder. Kron fours dan thorn live for us in santa cruz tonight with the very latest on this case than. Ken and pam investigators say they plan on staying on scene in ben lomond for at least the next few days. Search of the shooters home so far has turned up several guns and several explosives. The sheriff says that this gunman would have gotten away if it wasnt for some brave citizens who stepped in to help out. Heroic actions caught on camera fearless citizens pinning down accused cop killer Stephen Police say he was trying to escape after shooting and killing a deputy at his home in ben lowe month he was dangerous. Hes angry man intent on bringing harm. The
Rights law protects against Sexual Orientation employment discrimination. This is about hour. The employer has discriminated against the man because he treats that man worse than women who want to do the same thing. That discrimination is because those words, because the adverse employment action is based on the male employees failure to conform to a particular expectation about how men should behave, that men should be only attracted to women and not to men. Analytic difference between this kind of discrimination and forms of discrimination that have been already recognized by every court to have oppressed them. For example, discrimination of men who are effeminate rather than macho. Discrimination here, that discrimination is because of nonconformity with an expectation of how men should behave. Ofnnot in the words that attempt is futile because win a man is discriminated against for being gay, he is discriminated against for not conforming to an expectation on how men should behave.