obviously the investigators are still trying to figure out what was behind this, who the bomber is. i m told they ve identified a male as the bomber but they re still trying to learn more about him. what is most striking to you? what was the bomb made out of? because that leads you to oo lot of conclusions. this is the deadliest terror attack since july 7th, 2000 fiv 2005. and almost certainly a hydrogen puraukside bomb. because the signature of al qaeda and isis are these kinds of bombs. so where was it made? because you need a commercial refrigerator often the store the chemicals. they re very toxic if you re making these kinds of bombs, you re oftenb wearing a gas mask. there s a whole apparatus i would be looking for. we don t know if it s a hydrogen
peroxide bomb. would it be a loan wolf scenario? or how likely would that be? i m skeptical. we ve had people in this country build those bombs and kill themselves. it s difficult. you need training. i ve been in bomb making
somalia. as if this is another step by the president to intimidate witnesses. he did not intimidate to you. you are here. you have endured. there are other people out there that can expect this before treatment if they come forward. that is a question for us. you also indicated that the president has a prerogative to appoint a noncareer person, and to be candid, republican presidents and democratic presidents have done that. mr. sondland s transcript is out, and he was someone who indicated that everything hinged, the white house meeting and the release of the vital
defensive aid, everything hinged on the president president zelensky being able to do that election that would benefit the trump campaign. you are aware of that? yes. and you have indicated that would be something that you would not agree to do? yes. and sondland was quite willing to do? apparently so. i think you for your professional service and a yield back. ambassador yovanovitch, thank you for being
Expense payment to a lawyer or a legal expense in the books. they didn t call it expense in the books. they didn t call it obstruction, they didn t say they are call it obstruction, they didn t say they are building a building, it was called they are building a building, it was called a they are building a building, it was called a payment to a lawyer because as you called a payment to a lawyer because as you know, cohen is a lawyer, represented a lot of people over the years represented a lot of people over the years. i m not the only one. and it wasn t years. i m not the only one. and it wasn t very years. i m not the only one. and it wasn t very good in a lot of ways. in terms wasn t very good in a lot of ways. in terms of wasn t very good in a lot of ways. in terms of this representation, but he represented a lot of people. but he represented a lot of people. but he puts he represented a lot of people. but he puts in he represented a lot of people. but he puts i
Understand. there s been a lot of debate about whether donald trump had declassification authority and whether he used that an accused it properly. i almost do not think that really matter so much. if a grand jury him with a subpoena that said turn over all documents with classification markings on them, and donald trump, through his lawyers issued a sworn statement saying i have given you everything and the fact is he had not given over everything and he had over 100 more in his possession, that is the case. call it obstruction of a grand the case. call it obstruction ofa grandjury, the case. call it obstruction of a grand jury, call it perjury, but that is effectively what that is, the allegation that he lied. and while i think many people get hung up about the classified information part of this and say how come mike pence was not charged and how comejoe biden does not look like it be charged, katty kay but said is that distinction is that they
brian: so if you want to indict this guy indict that guy. and when you say obstruction. is it obstruction to hold on to documents for 30 years and not even find them. you found them because somebody ainsley: are they each going to pardon each other? brian: this is going to be the ongoing investigation of biden and all of a sudden we have a court date tuesday for trump. steve: jonathan turley was on our air last night. and he, keep in mind, it s a seven-count indictment. we don t know exactly what the charges are jonathan turley said posed a question will they charge him with possession of classified documents? because, if they do it would not to judge and charge joe biden. if they don t charge him on that case, the case will be about obstruction which you face 75 years in prison. and it involves conspiracy which obviously a conspiracy is between at that time least two people. and they have had months and we have been reading things that perhaps a number of the people close to h